Category Archives: plos biology
Slice of PLOS: Psychedelics in the Lab and Clinic: Making Up for Lost Time
Protocols: The Devil is in the Details
Posted by announcement, Biology, data, Debate, Editorial policy, featured, news, open access, plos biology, policy, Publishing, resources, video
inDear journals: Clean up your act. Regards, Concerned Biostatistician
Recently, a biostatistician sent an open letter to editors of 10 major science journals, urging them to pay more attention to common statistical problems with papers. Specifically, Romain-Daniel Gosselin, Founder and CEO of Biotelligences, which trains researchers in biostatistics, counted how many of 10 recent papers in each of the 10 journals contained two common […]
The post Dear journals: Clean up your act. Regards, Concerned Biostatistician appeared first on Retraction Watch.
Judge tosses case, saying that court-ordered retractions are not part of scientific publication
“Retractions are part and parcel of academic and scientific publication. Court ordered retractions are not.” So ends a judge’s September 30, 2016 opinion dismissing a case brought in 2014 by Andrew Mallon, a former Brown University postdoc, alleging that his advisor and former business partner, John Marshall, had published a paper in 2013 in PLOS Biology that should […]
The post Judge tosses case, saying that court-ordered retractions are not part of scientific publication appeared first on Retraction Watch.
Posted by authorship issues, Legal Threats, neuroscience retractions, PLoS, plos biology, united states
inResearcher who sued to stop retractions gets his sixth
A sixth retraction has appeared for a diabetes researcher who previously sued a publisher to try to stop his papers from being retracted. Mario Saad‘s latest retraction, in PLOS Biology, stems from inadvertent duplications, according to the authors. Though an investigation at Saad’s institution — the University of Campinas in Brazil — found no evidence of misconduct, a critic […]
The post Researcher who sued to stop retractions gets his sixth appeared first on Retraction Watch.
“I shared:” Can tagging papers that share data boost the practice?
After a journal began tagging papers that adopted open science practices — such as sharing data and materials — a few other scientists may have been nudged into doing the same. In January 2014, Psychological Science began rewarding digital badges to authors who committed to open science practices such as sharing the data and materials. A study published […]
The post “I shared:” Can tagging papers that share data boost the practice? appeared first on Retraction Watch.
Posted by freely available, not reproducible, PLoS, plos biology, psychology, unreliable findings
inAuthors retract striking circadian clock finding after failing to replicate
The authors of a paper showing a “striking and unanticipated” relationship between light and temperature in regulating circadian rhythms are retracting it when the results couldn’t be replicated. After being contacted by another group who couldn’t reproduce the data, the authors failed to, as well. They “have absolutely no explanation for the discrepancies with the original […]
The post Authors retract striking circadian clock finding after failing to replicate appeared first on Retraction Watch.
Popular paper by famous longevity researcher gets mega-correction
A highly cited paper by a well-known scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who studies longevity could have aged better: The ten-year-old paper has earned its second correction. It’s one of multiple papers by lead author Leonard Guarente that have been questioned on PubPeer. Guarente has already retracted one, and plans to address another. Guarente’s work […]
The post Popular paper by famous longevity researcher gets mega-correction appeared first on Retraction Watch.