PLOS backs down from expression of concern after author’s lawsuit

Soudamani Singh

A researcher who sued the publisher PLOS to prevent it from posting an expression of concern for one of her papers has dropped her suit, and the publisher tells us it will add a correction to the article instead – but may “revisit this case” to deal with “unresolved issues.”

We’ve previously reported on the lawsuit Soudamani Singh, an assistant professor in the Department of Clinical and Translational Sciences at Marshall University’s Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine in Huntington, W. Va., filed against PLOS in April, as well as signs of a pending settlement

According to an order filed November 2, Singh informed the court that she “voluntarily dismisses” the claims in her complaint, without the possibility of re-filing them, and the judge dismissed the case. 

In her complaint, Singh alleged that PLOS planned to place an expression of concern on one of her papers, “Cyclooxygenase pathway mediates the inhibition of Na-glutamine co-transporter B0AT1 in rabbit villus cells during chronic intestinal inflammation,” published in PLOS ONE in September 2018, after she and her co-authors had requested a correction of a duplicated image. The paper has been cited nine times, according to Clarivate’s Web of Science, but not since April 2021. 

A comment left last June 14 on one of our posts had identified a duplicated image in the paper, but the corresponding author told us he and his coauthors had noticed the “accidental error” independently and asked the journal for a correction. PLOS spokesperson David Knutson previously told us the authors contacted the publisher on June 17. 

Singh argued an expression of concern on the paper would imply “a certain level of intentional misconduct (i.e. plagiarism, falsifying data, etc.) or that something otherwise nefarious has occurred with an article,” and would be inappropriate.

PLOS’s guidelines for publishing expressions of concern do not mention misconduct, but state they are “notices published at editors’ discretion to alert readers of serious concerns about published work or an article’s compliance with PLOS policies (e.g. Data Availability).”

Singh asked for a temporary restraining order and permanent injunction to stop PLOS from publishing the expression of concern, as well as damages and legal fees. Her lawyer did not respond to our request for comment on the resolution of the case.

Knutson told us PLOS could not disclose terms of the settlement without Singh’s consent due to a confidentiality agreement. But he did tell us the publisher would add a correction to the article, “which achieves our editorial objective of providing key updates to the article’s readers.” He explained: 

We initially considered an Expression of Concern for this case due to unresolved concerns. After careful consideration we decided that there is sufficient support for the article’s results to allow us to publish a Correction at this time, even though some data concerns have not yet been resolved (as is described in the forthcoming Correction). It is unclear if the data concerns can be resolved and/or how long this would require; with this Correction decision, we prioritized timely resolution of the current case and transparent disclosure of the resolved and unresolved issues to readers. That said, we may revisit this case in the future depending on what comes of the pending data concern issue.

As a side note, PLOS has a policy and process in place by which our Publication Ethics team handles appeals of post-publication decisions. It is not necessary to involve legal representatives: authors’ appeals are considered as long as they are submitted in accordance with our policy, and filing a lawsuit only tends to delay case resolution and detract vital resources from other work. 

In a previous case, diabetes researcher Mario Saad sued a journal publisher to block expressions of concern on his work, but a U.S. federal judge denied the request for a restraining order and injunction because, as one legal commentator explained, the First Amendment does not allow courts to prohibit speech ahead of time. Saad, who is now up to 19 retractions, recently had four more expressions of concern from the same journal.

Like Retraction Watch? You can make a tax-deductible contribution to support our work, follow us on Twitter, like us on Facebook, add us to your RSS reader, or subscribe to our daily digest. If you find a retraction that’s not in The Retraction Watch Database, you can let us know here. For comments or feedback, email us at team@retractionwatch.com.

Two years: That’s how long it took a PLOS journal to flag a paper after a sleuth raised concerns

Two years after being alerted to a questionable figure in a 2016 paper by a group with a questionable publication history, a PLOS journal has issued an expression of concern about the article. The paper, “Deprivation of L-Arginine Induces Oxidative Stress Mediated Apoptosis in Leishmania donovani Promastigotes: Contribution of the Polyamine Pathway,” was published in  … Continue reading Two years: That’s how long it took a PLOS journal to flag a paper after a sleuth raised concerns

Posted by in PLoS

Permalink

Journals retract more than a dozen studies from China that may have used executed prisoners’ organs

In the past month, PLOS ONE and Transplantation have retracted fifteen studies by authors in China because of suspicions that the authors may have used organs from executed prisoners. All of the original studies — seven in Transplantation, and eight in PLOS ONE — were published between 2008 and 2014. Two involved kidney transplants, and … Continue reading Journals retract more than a dozen studies from China that may have used executed prisoners’ organs

With a badly handled tweet, PLOS angers scientists after a blog disappears

Tamsin Edwards was stunned. And hurt. On the afternoon of Friday, April 5, Edwards had just learned that her blog, “All Models Are Wrong,” had disappeared from the PLOS Blogs Network, where it was hosted. No warning. No communication from PLOS. So Edwards, a climate scientist at King’s College, London, tweeted: Dear @PLOS @PLOSBlogs my … Continue reading With a badly handled tweet, PLOS angers scientists after a blog disappears

Posted by in PLoS

Permalink

Glasgow professor leaves post amidst multiple retractions

A professor specializing in the health of children and pregnant women has left her post at the University of Glasgow, and issued three retractions in recent months. All three notices — issued by PLOS ONE — mention an investigation at the university, which found signs of data manipulation and falsification. Fiona Lyall, the last author … Continue reading Glasgow professor leaves post amidst multiple retractions

Have you seen more detail in PLOS ONE retraction notices? You’re welcome

If you’ve been pausing at some detailed PLOS ONE notices lately — such as one issued last month for a cancer paper that lists 21 shortcomings — you’re not alone. According to a spokesperson for the publisher, the journal has been progressively pushing towards more transparency in its notices — in part, because it was … Continue reading Have you seen more detail in PLOS ONE retraction notices? You’re welcome

Coming Down the Mountain: How Changes in the Water Cycle are Affecting Mountain Ecosystems

  As plants take in sunlight and carbon dioxide to grow, they also respire or “breath” out part of that carbon dioxide back to the atmosphere. When this occurs belowground from the plant’s roots, it’s

The Hidden Gems of Data Accessibility Statements

  Sometimes the best part of reading a scientific paper is an unexpected moment of recognition — not in the science, but in the humanity of the scientists. It’s reassuring in a way to find

Mark Twain and The Big Stump: Can We Save Nature From Ourselves?

  As you enter Kings Canyon and Sequoia National Park from highway 180 there is a small little parking lot to the side with a couple of bathrooms and a non-descript, standard-issue, brown, wooden park

National Parks are for the Birds

  Happy National Parks week! While I tend to plan trips around plants — Thuja plicata in Olympic National Park, Lathyrus japonicas at Cape Cod National Seashore — I understand the draw of non-botanical Park