Pay $1000 to criticize a bad ‘blood test for depression’ article?

No way, call for retraction. Would you pay $1,000 for the right to criticize bad science in the journal in which it originally appeared? That is what it costs to participate in postpublication peer review at the online Nature Publishing … Continue reading »

The post Pay $1000 to criticize a bad ‘blood test for depression’ article? appeared first on PLOS Blogs Network.

How to critique claims of a “blood test for depression”

Special thanks to Ghassan El-baalbaki and John Stewart for their timely assistance. Much appreciated. “I hope it is going to result in licensing, investing, or any other way that moves it forward…If it only exists as a paper in my … Continue reading »

The post How to critique claims of a “blood test for depression” appeared first on PLOS Blogs Network.