Category Archives: nejm retractions
NEJM paper retracted for “inaccuracies in the analytic database and data analyses”
Posted by nejm retractions
inHow a plagiarized eye image in the NEJM was discovered
Posted by nejm retractions, ophthalmology, plagiarism
inDoes the Mediterranean diet prevent heart attacks? NEJM retracts (and replaces) high-profile paper
Posted by investigator error, nejm retractions, nutrition, society journal retractions
inCaught Our Notice: Big journal, big correction
Big corrections usually weaken findings. But a recent NEJM one strengthened them, author says
A 2016 study in New England Journal of Medicine has received a substantial correction, which affected several aspects of the article. Typically, an error that affects so much of a paper would undermine the results (and possibly lead to a retraction). But in this case, the revised dose calculations actually strengthened the findings, according to […]
The post Big corrections usually weaken findings. But a recent NEJM one strengthened them, author says appeared first on Retraction Watch.
NEJM issues unusual warning for readers about 1980 letter on opioid addiction
This week, the New England Journal of Medicine issued a type of editor’s note we’ve never seen before, on a highly influential letter published nearly 40 years ago. Above the one-paragraph letter, which reports data suggesting pain medications are not likely to cause addiction, the journal has added a note warning readers that the letter has […]
The post NEJM issues unusual warning for readers about 1980 letter on opioid addiction appeared first on Retraction Watch.
How should journals update papers when new findings come out?
When authors get new data that revise a previous report, what should they do? In the case of a 2015 lung cancer drug study in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), the journal published a letter to the editor with the updated findings. Shortly after the paper was published, a pharmaceutical company released new data showing the drug […]
The post How should journals update papers when new findings come out? appeared first on Retraction Watch.
NEJM quickly corrects disclosure statement, errors in diabetes paper
After publishing a paper about neuropathy in diabetic patients last week, The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) immediately corrected it after editors learned of errors and some missing disclosures within the article. The notice explains that the sole author of the paper, “Diabetic Sensory and Motor Neuropathy,” reported incorrect doses for several medications, and […]
The post NEJM quickly corrects disclosure statement, errors in diabetes paper appeared first on Retraction Watch.
Upon request, NEJM added note to help Texas distance itself from Planned Parenthood article
The New England Journal of Medicine added a disclaimer to a recent article about the effects of funding cuts to Planned Parenthood, after a request from the Texas Health and Human Services Commission, saying it wanted to distance itself from the paper. Since the paper was published in February, one author has stepped down from his position at […]
The post Upon request, NEJM added note to help Texas distance itself from Planned Parenthood article appeared first on Retraction Watch.
NEJM: No plan to clarify wording that led to allegations of breached confidentiality
The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) has no plans to change the wording of an article that led to allegations of breached patient confidentiality and caused a minor social media firestorm this past weekend, the journal told Retraction Watch. The paragraph in question appeared in an essay by Lisa Rosenbaum chronicling the history of power […]
The post NEJM: No plan to clarify wording that led to allegations of breached confidentiality appeared first on Retraction Watch.