Category Archives: EveryOne
Sensitive CRISPR diagnostics using RNA targeting CRISPR enzyme
Posted by Biosecurity, Broad Institute, C2c2, cancer diagnostics, Cas13a, CRISPR, CRISPR diagnostics, CRISPR-dx, diagnostics, EveryOne, featured, POC diagnostics, pterosaurs, SDGs, synbio, synthetic biology, Twitter Chat, zika
inYour Top 15 in ’15: Most popular on PLOS BLOGS Network
Posted by #SfN15, Absolutely Maybe, Collaboration between scientists, DNA Science, drug prices, EveryOne, featured, History of Public Health, medically unexplained symptoms, Mind the Brain, Obesity Panacea, PLoS Biologue, plos biology, PLOS BLOGS Network, PLoS Medicine, PLOS Neuro, PLOS One, PLOS Paleo, Public Health Perspectives, Public science communication, scicomm, science communication, Science Writing, sciwriters, Victoria Costello
inIs PLOS One the future of scientific publishing?
So back to the question that is asked in the title of this post, "Is PLOS One the future of scientific publishing?", I am going to have to say a tentative "Yes". I think their basis of publishing papers not on novelty, but focusing peer-review on ensuring that the methods, and conclusions drawn from the results are scientifically sound, opens many doors for how scientists publish their findings. Currently, scientists compete for a limited space in a "high-impact" journal. In the majority of cases papers are not rejected because of their methods, results, and conclusions are not valid, but due to a better paper being submitted at the same time. This competition is justified, but in this current format has various drawbacks including:
- Importance of research is determined by a very small number of reviewers and usually a single editor has the final decision
- Significance or novelty of research is very subjective and can vary widely between reviewers
- Significance can change over time as future experiments confirm or depend on the results of the current research (including negative results)
- Not making the cut (i.e. rejection) results in a large waste of time as authors have to reformat, resubmit, and respond to new reviewers comments
Personally, I have never published in PLOS One and by no means do I think PLOS One in its current form is the pinnacle of publishing. However, I do appreciate that they are trying to change the way science publishing is currently conducted.
Posted by EveryOne, paper impact factor, PLOS One, Publishing
in