Social networking site privacy breach complaint prompts retraction

A journal has removed a paper after realizing it contained a verbatim quote from a patient that could reveal the patient’s identity. The journal learned of the slip-up after receiving a complaint from a social networking site for patients called PatientsLikeMe, which enables people with similar conditions to connect with each other. The retracted paper […]

The post Social networking site privacy breach complaint prompts retraction appeared first on Retraction Watch.

Despite apology, bagpipes study not slated for retraction

It’s not often that a paper elicits an apology — but that’s just what happened when family members first learned a bagpipe musician died from inhaling mold and fungi from a case study reported in a journal. The hospital has since apologized; the journal, however, told us it is not planning to issue a retraction. The […]

The post Despite apology, bagpipes study not slated for retraction appeared first on Retraction Watch.

Journal retracts nutrition paper, citing authors’ “unethical behavior”

A journal has retracted a paper for a somewhat unusual reason — and swapped the article with an entirely new paper by different authors. The journal, Materia Socio-Medica, said it’s retracting a paper about diet in dialysis patients because of some of the authors “un-ethical behaviors” in previous issues of the journal. In its place, the […]

The post Journal retracts nutrition paper, citing authors’ “unethical behavior” appeared first on Retraction Watch.

HIV paper pulled for lack of consent, errors

A researcher failed to obtain proper consent from HIV patients included in his study about risky sexual behavior, according to the journal that retracted his paper. The study, based on interviews with 154 men and women living with HIV, concluded that experiencing negative life events correlated with risky sexual behavior. But although the author claimed to have complied with […]

The post HIV paper pulled for lack of consent, errors appeared first on Retraction Watch.

Engineering journal pulls two papers for “compromised” peer review

An engineering journal has retracted two papers for faked or rigged peer review, but authors of one of the papers are objecting to the retraction.  The first author of that paper told us he and his co-authors “absolutely disagree” with the retraction, and are prepared to use “legal means” to safeguard their “rights and interests.” He […]

The post Engineering journal pulls two papers for “compromised” peer review appeared first on Retraction Watch.

Journal flags paper over allegations it used competitors’ text, plasmids

A journal has issued an expression of concern (EOC) for a paper on a common crop virus after the authors were accused of using competitors’ unpublished text and plasmids. Investigations by the journal and the involved institutions — the University of the Witwatersrand in South Africa, where the paper’s authors are based, and North Carolina State […]

The post Journal flags paper over allegations it used competitors’ text, plasmids appeared first on Retraction Watch.

Fake email for corresponding author forces neuro journal to retract paper

A chair of a neurobiology department in China has requested the retraction of a paper on which he was unwittingly listed as the lead and corresponding author. How could a corresponding author — you know, the person with whom the journal corresponds about the paper — be added without their consent? It seems that a fraudulent email account was involved in […]

The post Fake email for corresponding author forces neuro journal to retract paper appeared first on Retraction Watch.

Should researchers guilty of misconduct go to “rehab”?

A report on the first few years of “researcher rehab” suggests that three days of intensive training have a lasting impact on participants. Specifically, among participants — all of whom had been found guilty of at least one type of misconduct — the authors report that: A year later, follow-up surveys indicate that the vast majority […]

The post Should researchers guilty of misconduct go to “rehab”? appeared first on Retraction Watch.

Author “committed serious mistakes,” finds Taipei investigation

An investigation at Taipei Medical University found that an author made “serious mistakes” when preparing a manuscript. The journal prompted the university to investigate the paper, which looks at the role of a protein in repairing arteries after an injury. The retraction notice explains: It was brought to our attention that several of the figure panels in […]

The post Author “committed serious mistakes,” finds Taipei investigation appeared first on Retraction Watch.

Cancer researchers: We took data from another lab

Authors have admitted to using material from another lab for their paper on neuroblastoma. A spokesperson for Springer told us that the theft came to light when: The scientists, from whom the data originated, contacted the journal. The editor in chief of the journal investigated the case, the spokesperson told us, and then issued this retraction notice: […]

The post Cancer researchers: We took data from another lab appeared first on Retraction Watch.