Signing Critical Peer Reviews & the Fear of Retaliation: What Should We Do?

0000-0002-8715-2896   There’s a sort of Godwin’s Law for discussions on open peer review. Sooner or later, someone’s going to say, “We can’t expect early career researchers to sign peer reviews, because of fear of retaliation”. And

Live Blogging #PeerRevWk17 Day 3: Innovations in Peer Review and Scientific Publishing

0000-0002-8715-2896   Over 500 science journal editors, publishers, and meta-researchers are gathered in Chicago for the 8th Peer Review Congress (#PRC8), a once-every-4-years researchfest about “enhancing the quality and credibility of science”. I’m live-blogging – you can catch

3 Things Expressions of Concern Reveal About the Research Publication System

0000-0002-8715-2896   An editorial expression of concern is a way to alert readers to behind-the-scenes worries about the integrity of a publication. It emerged in 1997, from the influential International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, but was

The Science Opinion Games: New Conversations, Same Old Voices?

  “Women scientists seem to be underrepresented in science activities that make their reflections public.” I wrote that glum-making sentence. It was in an editorial for PLOS Medicine about post-publication culture. The studies that led me to this conclusion are cited there: under-representation … Continue reading »

The post The Science Opinion Games: New Conversations, Same Old Voices? appeared first on PLOS Blogs Network.

Science’s Water Coolers: Turning Up the Volume On Journal Clubs

  London, 1835 – 1854.  Sometimes they just played cards. But mostly, they would gather in a small room over a baker’s shop and read journals. The doctors had formed “a kind of club” because the hospital library didn’t have a … Continue reading »

The post Science’s Water Coolers: Turning Up the Volume On Journal Clubs appeared first on PLOS Blogs Network.