Category Archives: ulrich lichtenthaler
Management researcher with 16 retractions has new professorship
Posted by germany retractions, management, ulrich lichtenthaler
inGerman dep’t head reprimanded for not catching mistakes of co-author Lichtenthaler
The head of a department at WHU — Otto Beisheim School of Management has been charged with “severe scientific misconduct” for not spotting many of the data irregularities of his co-author Ulrich Lichtenthaler, which have ultimately led to 16 retractions. According to a news release describing a WHU investigation (which we had translated using One Hour Translation), […]
The post German dep’t head reprimanded for not catching mistakes of co-author Lichtenthaler appeared first on Retraction Watch.
After 16 retractions, management professor Lichtenthaler resigns post
Posted by germany retractions, management, ulrich lichtenthaler
inUlrich Lichtenthaler retraction count rises to 16
Management prof Lichtenthaler up to 15 retractions
Posted by business, germany retractions, management, ulrich lichtenthaler
inUlrich Lichtenthaler now up to 12 retractions
Industrial and Corporate Change is the site of management professor Ulrich Lichtenthaler’s 12th retraction.
Here’s the notice for “Outward knowledge transfer: the impact of project-based organization on performance,” originally published in 2010:
This article has been retracted by the journal’s Editors, Oxford University Press, and the author. The article has been retracted because of statistical irregularities and because of incomplete citation to other work by the author. The retraction follows an investigation by the Editors, during the course of which the author proactively contacted the Editors concerning the statistical irregularities.
The paper has been cited once, by a book about strategic management, according to Thomson Scientific’s Web of Knowledge.
The Otto Beisheim School of Management, also known as the WHU, said last week it expected its investigation into Lichtenthaler’s work to be complete by the end of June, according to the Open Innovation blog, which reported the new retraction Tuesday.
Hat tip: Ben