Category Archives: corrections
Caught Our Notice: “The first author cut the thermoprinter paper printout into pieces and reassembled them”
Caught Our Notice: Voinnet co-author issues another correction
Caught Our Notice: Big journal, big correction
Caught Our Notice: Brian Wansink issues correction that’s longer than original paper
Posted by caught our notice, corrections, economics, elsevier, freely available, nutrition, preventive medicine, united states
inCaught Our Notice: Forgot to make your article open access? It’ll cost you (with a correction)
Title: Industrial antifoam agents impair ethanol fermentation and induce stress responses in yeast cells What Caught Our Attention: When authors decide they want to make their articles freely available after they’ve already been published, how should publishers indicate the change, if at all? Recently, Ross Mounce (@rmounce) thought it was odd a Springer journal issued a […]
The post Caught Our Notice: Forgot to make your article open access? It’ll cost you (with a correction) appeared first on Retraction Watch.
Caught Our Notice: 1,376 words of overlap in paper by food researcher Brian Wansink
Title: Change Their Choice! Changing Behavior Using the CAN Approach and Activism Research What Caught Our Attention: Food researcher Brian Wansink has had a rough time lately. After researchers began scrutinizing his work, he has racked up five retractions and multiple corrections. (We’re counting one retracted paper twice, as Wansink first retracted and replaced it with a […]
The post Caught Our Notice: 1,376 words of overlap in paper by food researcher Brian Wansink appeared first on Retraction Watch.
Caught Our Notice: Oops — paper included proofreader’s query
Title: Concise Review: Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Neurodegenerative Diseases What Caught Our Attention: Everyone makes mistakes — but some are more amusing than others. In one recent correction, the publisher (Wiley) admitted to including a proofreader’s query in the published manuscript. But didn’t say what the query was. We looked around, and think we found the added […]
The post Caught Our Notice: Oops — paper included proofreader’s query appeared first on Retraction Watch.
Caught Our Notice: Reporter’s inquiry prompts financial disclosure in autism paper
Title: Promoting child-initiated social-communication in children with autism: Son-Rise Program intervention effects What caught our attention: When journalist Brendan Borrell was investigating a controversial autism treatment program for Spectrum, he came across a study where lead author Kat Houghton failed to disclose a prior relationship with the treatment center that taught the program, called Son-Rise. The Spectrum article notes: […]
The post Caught Our Notice: Reporter’s inquiry prompts financial disclosure in autism paper appeared first on Retraction Watch.
Caught Our Notice: Another retraction for researcher paid $100k to leave uni
When Retraction Watch began in 2010, our co-founders Ivan Oransky and Adam Marcus quickly realized they couldn’t keep up with the hundreds of retractions that appeared each year. And the problem has only gotten worse — although we’ve added staff, the number of retractions issued each year has increased dramatically. According to our growing database, just shy of […]
The post Caught Our Notice: Another retraction for researcher paid $100k to leave uni appeared first on Retraction Watch.
Caught Our Notice: Investigation finds “accidental mistakes” in PNAS stem cell paper
When Retraction Watch began in 2010, our co-founders Ivan Oransky and Adam Marcus quickly realized they couldn’t keep up with the hundreds of retractions that appeared each year. And the problem has only gotten worse — although we’ve added staff, the number of retractions issued each year has increased dramatically. According to our growing database, […]
The post Caught Our Notice: Investigation finds “accidental mistakes” in PNAS stem cell paper appeared first on Retraction Watch.
Posted by caught our notice, cell biology, corrections, figure misuse, freely available, NAS, PNAS, uk retractions
in