Health Canada Says a Nosode Is Not a Vaccine… But You Can Buy It Anyway (For Fun?)

Health Canada is finally making (baby) steps toward better informing the public when it comes to homeopathy.

As readers of the blog should know by now, homeopathy is based on really silly, counterfactual beliefs that, if true, would lead to a complete rewrite of biology and chemistry textbooks.

Despite this, Health Canada routinely approves homeopathic remedies for sale in Canada.

On July 31, 2015, it introduced “label changes” for certain homeopathic preparations.

Labels on nosodes, which are homeopathic preparations of heavily diluted infectious pus and spit sold as natural alternatives to vaccines, will have to mention this: “This product is neither a vaccine nor an alternative to vaccination. This product has not been proven to prevent infection. Health Canada does not recommend its use in children and advises that your child receive all routine vaccinations.” The change is effective January 1, 2016.

Secondly, “Health Canada is no longer allowing companies to make specific health claims on homeopathic products for cough, cold, and flu for children 12 and under, unless those claims are supported by scientific evidence.” This simply means that these products, like most natural health products, will have to resort to vague claims such as “helps with” and “can be used as part of”.

While this is a step in the right direction, I feel the need to point out that these useless preparations will still carry a Health Canada product number and will continue to be sold in Canada.

Health Canada does not recommend the use of nosodes in children but continues to allow for their sale. Just like cigarettes.

I’m Majoring in Science, With a Minor in Wishful Thinking

The infiltration of pseudoscience in academia, either universities proper or academic health centres, is very real. Dr. David Gorski is doing a great job reporting on the American side of this disturbing inroad, but I thought it was time to tackle the Canadian (and more specifically the Quebec) perspective.

The Prince Arthur Herald recently published an article of mine entitled “I’m Majoring in Science, With a Minor in Wishful Thinking”. You may be surprised to learn that chiropractic, reflexology, and acupuncture have all made forays into academia in Montreal.

From the article,

“What used to be a shibboleth—a phrase such as “evidence-based”—is now commonly used by quackademics as a smokescreen to deceive funding agencies, the general public, and perhaps the quackademics themselves. Everyone is engaging in “evidence-based practice”. The phrase has stopped to carry the meaning it once had and now serves as a fashion rule. If you don’t put “evidence-based” in front of what you practice or research, you will not be taken seriously. The critical assessment of the evidence that used to follow is no longer a requirement.”

You can read the full article here.

I would also encourage you to post it on social media and to comment on it. My last article for the Herald elicited a number of irrational comments from the hardcore believers in the power of sugar pills. Let’s hear it for rationality.

More herbal supplement regulation? Plus scientific April Foolery

REGULATION OF HERBAL SUPPLEMENTS IS A SCAM. BUT YOU KNEW THAT. Steven Novella reports at Neurologica on a nice piece of investigative science journalism about government (non)regulation of the supplement industry at the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. CBC researchers created a … Continue reading »

The post More herbal supplement regulation? Plus scientific April Foolery appeared first on PLOS Blogs Network.

Watch: Journalists Get Health Canada License Number for Fake Remedy

If you have ever bought a natural health product approved by Health Canada, you must watch this 22-minute episode of CBC’s Marketplace.

Do you have any idea how easy it is to get approval from Health Canada to manufacture and sell a natural health product?

You will hear from me on this topic in a couple of weeks. In the meantime, watch this incredible report:

http://www.cbc.ca/marketplace/episodes/2014-2015/drugstore-remedies-licence-to-deceive

CBC Marketplace show


Watch: Comedy and Skepticism… via That Mitchell & Webb Look

A recent exchange on Twitter brought back to mind a hilarious British comedy sketch show entitled That Mitchell and Webb Look, starring David Mitchell and Robert Webb.

If you are not familiar with it (or want to watch clips of it again), here are some skits of theirs that pertain to pseudoscience and medicine:


Listen: Dr. Christopher Labos and I on the Rise of Integrative Medicine

This month, Within Reason tackles a scientific topic, so I can publicize it here! Woohoo!

Would you like a side of magic with your chemo? Disproven folk remedies used to be the domain of snake oil salesmen; now, they are being integrated into university health centres. Jonathan speaks to Dr. Christopher Labos, a public science educator and cardiologist, on this worrying trend. Where is the line between feel-goodery and wishful thinking? The recent case of Makayla Sault highlights the harm caused by magic’s new veneer of respectability. Back in the studio, Andrew Cody returns to the podcast, flanked by Anna af Hallstrom, to discuss laundry balls, foot detox, and child abuse. Are our panelists hopeful for the future of science-based medicine?

You can listen to the podcast (for free) at http://withinreason.podbean.com.

If you prefer iTunes, search for “Within Reason” and look under “Podcasts”!

Within Reason Season 2 Logo 600


Homeopathy Awareness Day: Post-Mortem

Homeopathy is the low-hanging fruit from the perennial tree of irrationality.

This year, in order to draw awareness to its ludicrous claims, I published an article in the Prince Arthur Herald and a video on this site. The response was predictable.

While the content received plenty of positive feedback and dissemination, a couple of proponents of homeopathy perked up because of the “#homeopathy” on Twitter and a war of words began.

Laurie J. Willberg is a scuba diving instructor from Toronto who is studying homeopathy after having been turned away from “con medicine” (isn’t that cute) when a loved one died following the application of veterinary medicine. Christine Jahnig suffered from horrible insomnia following a car accident until homeopathy cured her of her condition. Both of them engaged me in a game of “I know you are but what am I?” on Twitter.

A fellow skeptic threw his hands in the air (I can only imagine) and wrote, “It’s like religion.”

Obviously, as with religion, one will not be able to reach the most “extreme” factions within the movement. They have too much invested in this to turn around and admit they were wrong. That is why highly intelligent people can end up in cults and stick around to the bitter end. Deeply-entrenched believers in homeopathy do not understand cognitive biases. Some have had bad experiences with conventional Western medicine (a science which is far from perfect but is the best treatment system we have) and so chastise the entire idea and embrace the humanizing and reassuring current of pseudomedicine: chakra alignments, Qi flow, homeopathy. These people likewise know very little about logical fallacies, as my Twitter feed demonstrated today: many people use homeopathy so it must be good; medicine can kill people therefore must be thrown out; science is a cult.

My video was not aimed at the die-hard serial diluters, but rather at the public at large who may be consuming these preparations without really knowing what they are. If you have not invested so much of your time defending the homeopathy ideology–because it is an ideology, one that must remain unchanged despite evidence contradicting it–there may be hope that a dash of reason and facts will turn you away from pseudoscience.

Science education is difficult. It always feels like a losing war. But it is worth pursuing.

Here’s a reminder why:

Tweet from Christine Jahnig (@fallintosummer): “Ur EBM [evidence-based medicine] is 3rd leading cause death & causes 2M hospitalizations yrly in US. H’pathy proven effective and safe.”

Let’s educate people better so they don’t spout this idiotic, fallacious nonsense so regularly. There is work to do.


Homeopathy Is Not Scientific

The Prince Arthur Herald, a McGill University student publication, has just published a short piece I wrote on homeopathy. Here is an excerpt:

“In the mid-2000s, semi-isolated acts of “suicide by homeopathy” were performed as demonstrations of the lack of efficacy of this antiquated belief system, culminating in the Liverpudlian 10:23 challenge which extended this act of rational defiance to 30 countries. If homeopathy consists of natural but potent alternative medical treatments, as many people believe, how can you not overdose on them? There is more than meets the eye with regards to homeopathy.”

You can read the whole article here.

I made a companion video which can be accessed here.


Cracked Science Video 3: Homeopathy

It’s October 23rd or 10-23, which has been suggested as Homeopathy Awareness Day, in homage to Avogradro’s number.

Today is as good a day as any to investigate the claims made by homeopathy.

Reading about homeopathy is one thing; seeing the dilutions is another. I hope this is graphic enough for you.

I have also published a public science article on homeopathy in the Prince Arthur Herald as a companion piece.


A Cure for AIDS that Big Pharma Doesn’t Want! Sounds Familiar?

I was sent a link to the following story by someone who wanted my opinion on it. The article is in French but I will highlight its claims.

“Son remède contre le sida, les labos n’en veulent pas”

Translation: “Labs don’t want his AIDS remedy.”

This is yet another David-versus-Goliath “news” report on a maverick humanitarian who just happens to have stumbled upon a cure for a debilitating or fatal disease that just so happens to be dirt cheap, and so Big Pharma does not even return his calls because it can’t make trillions of dollars selling his cure. Let the people die from their sickness! It’s not like pharmaceutical company employees have families and friends of their own who may also be sick; rather every pharma employee in the world is a soulless, corporate drone addicted to money.

This particular article tells the story of a Robert Vachy, a hardcore mountain-climber (which has no bearing on the story except to anchor your mind on this idea of a lone man who conquers the odds) who tinkered in his kitchen and created, get this, his very own sunscreen! The story specifies that he was the head of R&D for Sandoz, now part of Novartis, so there is some reason to believe that he had a sufficient background, if the story is to be trusted, to engage in a bit of combinatorial chemistry in his spare time. The article does not explain why he felt the need to create his own sunscreen.

However, it turns out that his homemade sunscreen was not just great at repelling dastardly UV light; it was a universal virus killer. That’s right: from herpes to the common cold to HIV, the active ingredient in his homemade sunscreen could kill any virus. He even expects it to work against the Ebola virus!

The problem, of course, is that his miracle molecule costs only a few Euros: no pharmaceutical company in their right mind would want to sell it, since they would stop raking in the dough from their much more lucrative triple therapy. So the poor 81-year-old sap has sold his apartment “in Montmartre” (cue “La Bohème), invested all of his life savings into his small lab, and is now a pauper begging, just begging for the money he needs to cure AIDS.

Do you know why I know for a fact that this is quackery at its most typical? The article claims that none other than Françoise Barré-Sinoussi, the co-discoverer of the HIV, tested this miracle molecule in her lab in 1995, found that minimal amounts of it would kill 99.99% of HIV… and didn’t publish this revolutionary finding in any peer-reviewed journal.

I checked Medline.

There are no articles with “Amovir” (the name of the molecule) and either her name or Robert Vachy’s name. If you can find this article, please send it to me. As it stands, it looks as if the co-discoverer of the HIV had the miracle cure in her lab and decided against publishing these findings. It must be a conspiracy by Big Pharma.

The mistake Vachy made was in going to the wrong co-discoverer of the HIV. If he’d gone to Luc Montagnier instead, the two of them would be in China right now, investigating homeopathic Amovir to cure the Ebola virus.