Endosymbiosis Animations for "Biodiversity and the Tree of Life"

So I am in the midst of co-teachign a very large introductory biology course at UC Davis "BIS2C - Biodiversiy and the tree of Life". I cover much of microbial diversity in this class and also the large scale structure of the Tree of Life. 

As always, I spent a lot of time working on slides and such for this class and recently posted some animations based on these slides to Twitter and Facebook and thought I would share some of them here. For today, I am sharing the animations I made on Endosymbiosis. I posted a first version of this to Twitter last week. Note - I added music - Mussorgsky - Night on Bald Mountain for drama ... I also posted it to Facebook:

  

And boy am I glad I did. Because multiple people commented and pointed out parts that were, well, not correct. I had lecture too soon to fix them so I told my students about this and that I would update the slides. I then spent a day updating everything and made a new version which I think is much much better.

 

A special special issue of RNA Biology – dedicated to Carl Woese and Open Access too

A must read for, well, everyone out there: RNA Biology: Table of Contents for a special issue dedicated to / about Carl Woese.  The issue includes an amazing collection of papers:



A special issue in memoriam of Carl Woese
Renée Schroeder
Page 169
http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/rna.28566

Introduction to special Carl Woese issue in RNA Biology
Robin R Gutell
Pages 170 - 171
http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/rna.28393

Carl Woese: A structural biologist’s perspective
Peter B Moore
Pages 172 - 174
http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/rna.27428

Early days with Carl
Ralph Wolfe
Page 175
http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/rna.27429

Molecular phylogenetics before sequences: Oligonucleotide catalogs as k-mer spectra
Mark A Ragan, Guillaume Bernard and Cheong Xin Chan
Pages 176 - 185
http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/rna.27505

Constraint and opportunity in genome innovation
James A Shapiro
Pages 186 - 196
http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/rna.27506

Carl Woese's vision of cellular evolution and the domains of life
Eugene V Koonin
Pages 197 - 204
http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/rna.27673

From Woese to Wired: The unexpected payoffs of basic research
Ann Reid
Pages 205 - 206
http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/rna.27701

Carl Woese, Dick Young, and the roots of astrobiology
John D Rummel
Pages 207 - 209
http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/rna.27702

Life is translation
Bojan Zagrovic
Pages 210 - 212
http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/rna.27718

Organelle evolution, fragmented rRNAs, and Carl
Michael W Gray
Pages 213 - 216
http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/rna.27799

Remembering Carl Woese
Kenneth R Luehrsen
Pages 217 - 219
http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/rna.27800

Woese on the received view of evolution
Sahotra Sarkar
Pages 220 - 224
http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/rna.27883

This article is open accessSecondary structure adventures with Carl Woese
Harry F Noller
Pages 225 - 231
http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/rna.27970

A backward view from 16S rRNA to archaea to the universal tree of life to progenotes: Reminiscences of Carl Woese
Roger A Garrett
Pages 232 - 235
http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/rna.28228

Carl Woese in Schenectady: The forgotten years
Larry Gold
Pages 236 - 238
http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/rna.28305

History and impact of RDP: A legacy from Carl Woese to microbiology
James R Cole and James M Tiedje
Pages 239 - 243
http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/rna.28306

Casting a long shadow in the classroom: An educator’s perspective of the contributions of Carl Woese
Mark Martin
Pages 244 - 247
http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/rna.28002

Looking in the right direction: Carl Woese and evolutionary biology
Nigel Goldenfeld
Pages 248 - 253
http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/rna.28640

Ten lessons with Carl Woese about RNA and comparative analysis
Robin R Gutell
Pages 254 - 272
http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/rna.28718

Memories of Carl from an improbable friend
Harris A Lewin
Pages 273 - 278
http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/rna.28866


Meet the Texas Blind Salamander

TX Blind Salamander picture 1The Texas Blind Salamander (Eurycea rathbuni) is a cave salamander that has adapted to life living in the dark. With extremely underdeveloped eyes, unpigmented skin, and the retention of its juvenile aquatic form, this salamander is perfectly suited to live in the underground cave streams. Found only in caves around San Marcos, Texas these salamanders are actually considered endangered on the State level. Because they live only in specific areas and rely on the Edwards aquifer, the Texas blind salamander is extremely susceptible to changes in water quality. Their size reaches between 3 and 5 inches and they eat a diet of most aquatic invertebrates.

Click here to read this story about a day in the life of the Texas Blind Salamander from the Tree of Life project.

Watch this video to see Eurycea rathbuni doing his thing at the Edwards aquifer:

Stay tuned to Nature Afield tomorrow for a follow-up on the interesting mating habits of the Texas Blind Salamander!!!

“Meet the…” is a collaboration between The Finch & Pea and Nature Afield to bring Nature’s amazing creatures into your home.


RIP Carl Woese: Collecting posts / notes / other information about my main science hero here

My tribute to Carl Woese 12/30/12
Sadly, Carl Woese has passed away.  I am collecting some links and posts about him here in his memory.  He was without a doubt the person who most influenced my career as a scientist.

News stories about Woese's passing
Some of my posts about Woese
Woese Tree of Life pumpkin (by J. Eisen)

Storification of Tweets and other posts about his passing

Other posts worth reading about Woese's passing
Some videos with Woese 







Miscellaneous

My graduate student Russell Neches used a laser to etch a picture of Carl Woese on a piece of toast.

Some quick comments on "Giant viruses coexisted w/ the cellular ancestors & represent a distinct supergroup"


Got asked on Twitter about this paper:

BMC Evolutionary Biology | Abstract | Giant viruses coexisted with the cellular ancestors and represent a distinct supergroup along with superkingdoms Archaea, Bacteria and Eukarya

I answered briefly
Don't have time for a detailed blog post but here are some quick comments:

1. Giant viruses are fascinating and cool

2. I have done work connected to the topic of this paper and thus might not be considered fully objective.  For example see

3. I see no evidence that the type of analysis that they do on protein folds is a robust phylogenetic method.  Phylogeny from sequence alignments (which is what we focus on in my lab) have been tested and tweaked for some 50 years.  There are 100s to maybe 1000s of papers on methods alone - not to mention the 1000s of papers using alignments for phylogenetics.  I am not convinced that the analysis being done here of FFs and FSFs is particularly robust.  It seems interesting, certainly.  But is it sound?  I mean, I could build phylogenetic trees from cell size, from shape, from eye color, and from all sorts of other features.  Those would all suck for certain.  Protein folds - not sure about them.  They almost certainly are prone to convergent evolution and I do not see any attempt in this analysis to deal with that issue.

4. The authors of the current paper do not show any taxa names on their trees - just colors for large groups of taxa (bacteria, archaea, eukaryotes and viruses).  It is really not good practice to remove the taxon names.  If they were there the first thing I would do is to look at the patterns within the groups they highlight.  Do all the major phyla / kingdoms of eukaryotes, for example, come out looking as one would expect based upon other studies.  Or are they all over the place?  Same for bacteria and archaea.  Not including taxa makes it nearly impossible to judge this paper positively.  I could not find this information in supplemental data either.

5. They really should have released the data tables they used for the phylogenetic analysis.  Don't know why they did not.

6. In Figure 3 with the rooting they have, either viruses are a subgroup of archaea or archaea are not monophyletic.  Not a good thing in a paper trying to claim viruses represent a fourth grouping on the tree of life.

Anyway - got to do some other things but just wanted to get some comments out there.

UPDATE 9/19 - some prior stories about the "fourth domain" and ancient viruses - to counter notion in the press release for this paper that their findings "shake up the tree of life".  Even if their specific inferences about viral evolution are correct, such inferences / conclusions have been made before.




My Tree of Life doodle on our food container from dinner at Seasons in #DavisCa


P537