Everything you need for Lab Week 2018

Everything you need for Lab Week 2018

Get ready for Lab Week! April 22-28 we will join our members and partners to celebrate the vital contributions laboratory professionals make to protect public health and safety in the US and around the globe. APHL will be particularly focused on the laboratory professionals who make up our community – the dedicated individuals working at local, state, environmental and agricultural laboratories which comprise the public health laboratory system.

We have lots of fun things planned this year! Scroll down for printable posters, downloadable graphics and more.

Follow APHL for our special Lab Week content (there might even be a contest on Facebook… hint hint…)!

While we celebrate our members, we also use Lab Week to increase awareness and demonstrate the importance of public health and environmental laboratories in our communities. We encourage you to do the same!

Below are some resources to help launch your own Lab Week celebration. These resources are for local, state, public health, environmental and agricultural laboratories alike!

Printable posters to display in your lab:

Everything you need for Lab Week 2018Graphics:

Sample social media posts (include a graphic or photo for added visibility):

Videos

Here are two animated videos to share with your public audiences. Feel free to share the link or embed on your website.

What exactly do public health laboratories do? Share these stories that highlight their work:

Encourage others to consider laboratory careers! Share these stories:

Celebration ideas:

  • Celebrate Lab Week internally with a social event, banners or other decorations.
  • Hold an open house for media, elected officials, school groups, staff families and other members of the public. Check out the Milwaukee Health Department Laboratory’s story about their health fair for students.
  • Visit local elementary, middle and high schools to talk with students interested in STEM disciplines.
  • Write an op-ed piece for local newspapers and/or magazines to highlight the valuable contributions your public health laboratory staff are making in your community, city and/or state.
  • Are you the lab director or section manager? Think of fun and meaningful ways to thank your staff for their dedication to public health.

Kick off Lab Week with an Earth Day celebration and carry it through the week!

  • Host a Green and Blue Day and ask staff to wear colors representing earth and water.
  • Hold a grounds-keeping afternoon: Invite staff and their families to help with weeding, mulch, planting, etc.
  • Ask if your regional EPA office plans to do something for Earth Day and join them as a partner.
  • Encourage employees to do Meatless Monday or purchase items at a local farmer’s market instead of the supermarket.
  • Encourage employees to Travel Differently on Tuesday carpooling, taking the bus, walking or riding their bike to work.

Check out the WEF-APHL environmental lab webcast: Introduction to the 2017 Method Update Rule

On April 26, 2018 1:00-3:00 pm ET, join Water Environment Federation (WEF) and the Association of Public Health Laboratories (APHL) for a free webcast that will introduce certified laboratory personnel to the changes found in the 2017 Method Update Rule (MUR). Updates include EPA-promulgated changes to Clean Water Act analytical test procedures for analyzing chemical, physical and biological components of wastewater and other environmental samples. If you work at a state or local public health or environmental laboratory and/or are an APHL member, please email Sarah Wright before registering to receive a code to waive the $40 fee.

The post Everything you need for Lab Week 2018 appeared first on APHL Lab Blog.

Q&A with Iowa’s Environmental Laboratory Director

Q&A with Iowa’s Environmental Laboratory Director | www.APHLblog.org

We talked with Michael Wichman, PhD, environmental laboratory director at the State Hygienic Laboratory at the University of Iowa, about what makes environmental labs unique. Learn more about environmental laboratories on APHL’s website and blog.

How did you first come to work at the State Hygienic Laboratory at the University of Iowa?

That was nearly 29 years ago. I was working in Cincinnati, Ohio at the time as a research chemist at a small inorganic pigment manufacturing company, and I saw an ad posted in the February 1, 1987 edition of the Kansas City Star for a chemist at the University Hygienic Laboratory (later renamed the State Hygienic Laboratory (SHL)). I still have a copy of the original ad. I grew up in Iowa, almost attended the University of Iowa and followed Iowa State and University of Iowa sports. I was also a Kansas City Royals and Chiefs fan which is why I was subscribed to the Kansas City Star. Returning to Iowa to be closer to my family for a position with the University of Iowa was quite appealing. (Note, my family also noticed the same ad in the Council Bluffs, Iowa and Omaha, Nebraska newspapers. They sent the ad to me via U.S. Mail — 1987 was way before email.) I submitted a typed (anyone remember typewriters?) application letter and resume on February 19th to the laboratory, had a telephone interview on Good Friday, an in-person interview the Monday after Mother’s Day and started my position at the laboratory that July.

How does an environmental health lab fit into the state public health system? What is the environmental lab’s role?

Environmental health is public health. One could argue that the origins of public health were founded in response to environmental issues. Testing performed by the state environmental health laboratory is a valuable source of objective information to determine the effect of environmental exposures on human and animal health. This can range from determination of asbestos, metals, nutrients, environmental and blood lead, as well as numerous organic compounds such as pesticides and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). These analytical services may support local, state and federal compliance monitoring requirements (Safe Drinking Water Act, Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, etc.), as well as local or state monitoring programs such as monitoring rivers, lakes and ambient air.

That’s just a portion of their work. Many state labs play an essential role in local, state and national environmental emergency response programs. Labs test various matrices (water, soil, food and plants) in response to chemical threat incidents, radiological exposure, contaminants in the food supply or water emergencies due to instances such as flooding or chemical spills. Unbiased, quality data allows government officials to remediate the emergency situation accordingly, protecting the public.

How are environmental labs unique? What makes them different from other types of PHLs?

Environmental laboratories are required to maintain a variety of certifications and accreditations for their various testing services, but these can vary vastly between states. Labs may need to be accredited by either the state, EPA or the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP). Additional accreditations may be required for asbestos, lead and industrial hygiene testing. The only certification consistent across the United States is for drinking water analysis under the Safe Drinking Water Act, and the State Principal Drinking Water Laboratory (which is generally the state environmental laboratory) which is certified by the EPA Regional Office.

Environmental laboratories also require unique equipment when compared to public health and clinical labs. This highly specialized instrumentation, coupled with a multitude of testing methods, allow labs to detect environmental contaminants at incredibly low levels.

What is an example of a situation early in your time at the Hygienic Lab where you really felt the value of your work?

There have been many incidents over the years. One example that comes to mind is when there was a diesel fuel spill in the Lucas Building where the Department of Health is located. A new fuel tank had been installed in the basement of the building, but not attached to the fill valve outside the building. Before the valve was attached to the tank, a diesel fuel tanker truck stopped by and began to fill the tank. Fuel went directly into the basement and eventually into floor drains and the wastewater treatment plant. Due to the potential toxicity of fumes, the building was evacuated and staff were not allowed to return until testing determined that the indoor air was safe. Laboratory staff worked most of the night to analyze samples to determine if the building was safe to reoccupy

Another example occurred Memorial Day weekend when the shredded tire lining at the Iowa City landfill caught fire. The smoke could be seen and smelled for many miles. SHL staff came into the laboratory that Saturday, Sunday and Monday. They deployed air samplers, collected and analyzed samples all weekend. Data was provided to local emergency management and local public health to develop and distribute public health announcements.

What’s the wildest thing that you have seen or heard of coming through your lab?

We have received many interesting samples over the years including a water sample in a Sioux Bee Honey® container, a tennis shoe, an actual bee hive, lead wheel weights, candy, various toys and more for testing.

What is something you think most people don’t know about environmental labs?

Environmental laboratories perform considerably more testing than the general public may realize and it goes well beyond drinking and wastewater. Staff at our laboratory and other environmental laboratories are incredibly dedicated and eager to provide analytical testing services to help ensure that our environment is safe.

 

 

Everything you need for Lab Week 2016

Everything you need for Lab Week 2016 | www.APHLblog.org

Lab Week is right around the corner! April 24-30 we will join several other laboratory associations to celebrate the vital contributions laboratory professionals make to protect public health and safety. APHL will be particularly focused on the laboratory professionals who make up our community – the dedicated individuals working at local, state, environmental and agricultural laboratories which comprise the public health laboratory system.

Follow APHL on Twitter and Facebook for our special Lab Week content! And make sure you are subscribed to our blog so you don’t miss any posts!

While we celebrate you, we also use Lab Week to increase awareness and demonstrate the importance of public health laboratories in our communities. We also encourage you to do the same! Here are some resources to help launch your own Lab Week celebration.

Social Media

Join the conversation using #LabWeek on any social network that uses hashtags (Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, etc.) 

Sample tweets:

Graphics for web and social media are below.

Proclamations

Encourage your mayor and/or governor to officially declare April 24-30, 2016 as Lab Week. Here are some sample proclamations to send to their offices:

Graphics

What exactly do public health laboratories do? Share these stories that highlight their work:

Encourage others to consider laboratory careers! Share these stories:

Celebration ideas:

  • Celebrate Lab Week internally with a social event, banners or other decorations.
  • Open house for media, elected officials, school groups, staff families and other members of the public
  • Career day for local middle and high school students interested in STEM disciplines
  • Write an op-ed piece for local newspapers and/or magazines to highlight the valuable contributions your public health laboratory staff are making in your community, city and/or state.
  • Are you the lab director or section manager? Think of fun and meaningful ways to thank your staff for their dedication to public health.

National Environmental Laboratory Professionals Week (NELPW) toolkit

APHL Trainings
Get your team together during Lab Week for this webinar: Emerging and Resurging Infectious Diseases: 2016 happening April 26, 2016.

Responding to the Animas River disaster: Who’s testing what?

by Megan Latshaw, director, Environmental Health, APHL

It was Saturday morning and my energetic six-year-old daughter was occupied for a moment, so I had a few seconds of quiet to scroll through my Twitter newsfeed. This photo of Colorado’s Animas River caught my eye and I immediately thought, “That has to be photoshopped.” I clicked the link and saw it wasn’t.

Responding to the Animas River disaster: Who’s testing what? | www.APHLblog.org“What’s going on?” I thought, as she bounded back in the room, tackling me with her typical exuberance. I squirmed up from underneath her and quickly retweeted the image, sensing it was something important.

Later the nation would learn that an EPA contractor accidentally released 3 million gallons of mine waste including metals such as lead, mercury and arsenic into the river, turning it the bright orange color that originally looked (and kind of still does) photoshopped despite being very real. (Photo by Josh Stephenson / Durango Herald)

As the story unfolded, the details revealed the seriousness of the situation. I decided to reach out to the state public health and environmental laboratories in the impacted states: Colorado, New Mexico and Utah. Were they receiving requests to test the water and soil (AKA sediment)? Were they overwhelmed? Did they plan to look for contaminants in people who may have been exposed?

This type of event sends public health and environmental laboratories in impacted states into emergency response mode. That means putting normal day-to-day work aside (and possibly even day-to-day personal life if the lab has to move to a 24/7 shift work). This sets the stage for one of the biggest challenges seen in laboratories during many emergency responses such as this one: prioritization. In this case, sample submitters went from characterizing samples as either priority 1 or 2, to labeling all samples as priority 1. So instead of being able to put some samples on hold (priority 2) in order to address the priority 1 samples, all samples must be addressed as soon as possible. This presents a challenge to an already stressed laboratory.

In an effort to assist with lab-to-lab emergency response coordination, APHL held a conference call on August 19. Here is what we heard:

– Testing was being done by multiple entities including public health labs, commercial labs and EPA.
– The Colorado public health laboratory saw more than 100 samples from surface water, sediments, irrigation canals and private well water within the first two weeks. As of the 24th, they expect to return to normal surveillance levels.
– The New Mexico public health laboratory saw between 40 and 60 river water samples submitted for a full range of testing including metals. By the time we spoke, technicians had completed work on most of the samples, sending about 500 results over the period of about one week. The laboratory expects to do biomonitoring (looking for chemicals in blood or urine).
– The Utah public health laboratory had not receive any water samples yet but they anticipated receiving some from privately owned water wells along with human specimens. With those expected samples, they will look for metals in the local population as part of a previously planned biomonitoring study by the health department.

Fortunately, the public health labs in the states affected by this spill had the ability to test not only soil and water samples, but also to look for exposure to pollution in humans. This capability is largely thanks to the testing foundation put in place by the Laboratory Response Network for Chemical Threats (LRN-C). The LRN-C, which began as a network of public health laboratories with special skills and equipment to use in the event of a chemical terrorist attack, has expanded its priorities over the last decade to include assisting in response to accidents involving chemicals. Without investments in the LRN-C, there would not have been instruments or trained personnel to do the biomonitoring that is planned.

The labs responded just as they should have – they were quick and thorough in both testing and reporting. Thanks to their hard work, we know that concentrations in the water have gone down, but we need to know more; we need to understand what potential increases in exposure mean to the people who swam, drank or otherwise came into contact with the contaminated water. Biomonitoring will help do that. My colleagues and I will be watching closely and continuing to encourage the use of biomonitoring during environmental emergencies just like this.

I keep coming back to my six-year-old and how I would feel wondering if she had been exposed to high levels of metals. If I lived in one of the affected communities, I would want to know.

If you live in a community impacted by environmental contamination, and you think a laboratory might be able to answer some of your questions, please visit APHL’s Meeting Community Needs site.