Climate Change Affects Communities and the Labs That Serve Them. How Prepared Is Yours?

Graphic that says, "Earth Day is Every Day"

By Donna Campisano, specialist, Communications, APHL

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), “Climate change is directly contributing to humanitarian emergencies from heatwaves, wildfires, floods, tropical storms and hurricanes, and they are increasing in scale, frequency and intensity.”

WHO reports that 3.6 billion people live in areas susceptible to the impacts of climate change and between 2030-2050, climate change is predicted to cause an additional 250,000 deaths per year due to impacts like heat stress and undernutrition.

Climate change is the result of many interconnected factors that require a wide array of data to understand so that potential solutions can be found. Fortunately, environmental and public health laboratories have established testing infrastructure and data collection that will help meet existing and future climate-change related needs.

Climate Change and Your Laboratory

Climate change not only affects our lives, it also affects our labs—especially when it comes to the type and volume of testing you do. Consider these statistics:

  • The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) notes that Lyme disease has nearly doubled since 1991, in part because the ticks that carry it thrive in our increasingly warmer temperatures.
  • Heavy downpours and flooding can cause sewage overflows as well as polluted storm water runoff and agricultural runoff. In 2021, WHO reported that 1.7 billion people used a water source contaminated with feces. These polluted water sources can lead to diseases such as cholera, dysentery and hepatitis A, among others.
  • Puerto Rico recently declared a public health emergency over rising cases of dengue, a disease carried by warm-weather, moisture-loving mosquitos.

Top 8 APHL Climate Change Resources

The climate crisis is a public health emergency. In recognition of Earth Day, we’ve compiled this list of APHL resources to help guide your lab to respond to the impacts and challenges of climate change.

  1. Leveraging Public Health Laboratory Science to Understand and Address Climate Change Health Impacts: This document provides information on areas of public health laboratory work that will likely be impacted by climate change.
  2. So, You Want to Make Your Laboratory More Sustainable…: This webinar outlines practical approaches laboratories can take to minimize unintended impacts to public health and the environment.
  3. Environmental Justice in Our Communities: Strategies for Laboratory Involvement: This webinar describes how public health labs can integrate environmental justice into their work.
  4. Cyanotoxins: A Guidance Document for Public Health Laboratories: Factors that lead to harmful algal blooms are exacerbated by climate change. This document provides laboratories guidance and resources on implementing cyanotoxin testing.  
  5. Naegleria fowleri: Public Health Response to Municipal Water-Associated Cases in Texas and Louisiana: Increasing temperatures and water system damage may increase contamination of treated drinking water with pathogens. This webinar discusses how two different health departments responded to water-associated Naegleria fowleri cases.
  6. SARS-CoV-2 Wastewater Surveillance Testing Guide for Public Health Laboratories: As climate change brings an increase in diseases, wastewater surveillance can be a useful tool to detect community disease burden.
  7. Citizen Science Toolkit: Citizen science—also known as community science, volunteer monitoring and public participation in scientific research, among other terms—uses the collective strength and knowledge of the public to gather and analyze data to answer environmental and public health questions. This toolkit can be used for potential testing for climate change effects.
  8. EH Lab Communications Toolkit: This toolkit can help laboratory directors advocate for and promote the role of environmental health testing.

What Happens After April 22?

Creating a healthier environment is a 24/7, 365-days-a-year endeavor. APHL will continue to work with laboratories around the country and the world to address issues related to climate change and advocate for ways to make the world a healthier place.

The post Climate Change Affects Communities and the Labs That Serve Them. How Prepared Is Yours? appeared first on APHL Blog.

Getting to the APHL 2024 Annual Conference Early? Take Advantage of These Preconference Workshops

"Register today for APHL 2024"

By Donna Campisano, specialist, Communications, APHL

The APHL 2024 Annual Conference officially kicks off midday Monday, May 6, but there’s plenty to take in before the meeting gears up (and we’re not talking a Brewer’s game—they’re out of town).

Preconference workshops will cover important topics ranging from attracting and retaining a talented public health workforce to effective communication strategies to improving biosafety.

Take a deep dive into these and other topics from leaders in the field and gain not just hands-on knowledge, but competencies and continuing education credits. Here, some highlights of what’s planned:

Laboratory Design Matters: Improving Biosafety and Biosecurity Through Efficient Facility Design, Maintenance and Risk Assessment Practices 
Part 1: May 5, 2024, 9:00 am – 5:00 pm CDT
Part 2: May 6, 2024, 8:00 am – 11:30 am CDT
 
Flyer Registration • $499 fee • 9 hours credit 

Ebola. Bird flu. Anthrax. Laboratory personnel deal with dangerous and potentially deadly pathogens as a matter of course. And that makes protecting those workers tantamount. This two-day, two-part, interactive workshop will highlight lab design, procedures and maintenance to optimize biosafety and biosecurity, helping to ensure that your lab, the people who work within it and the community that surrounds it are as safe as possible.

Making a Difference: A Workshop for Prospective APHL Global Health Consultants 
May 5, 2024, 8:00 am – 5:00 pm CDT 
Flyer Registration • no fee • no credits 

Public Health doesn’t just happen at home–it happens around the world. Learn more about APHL global health programs and how you can support them through consultancy. You’ll hear from consultants in the field and get an opportunity to engage in interactive exercises surrounding cultural sensitivity, safe travel and diplomacy.

Nonverbal Essentials for Success: Helpful Strategies for Scientific and Technical Communicators 
May 6, 2024, 8:00–11:15 am CDT  
Flyer •Registration • $149 fee • 3 hours credit 

Nonverbal communication can tell as much of a story as the spoken or written word. Make sure you’re getting the right message across. This workshop will help public health laboratorians recognize, engage in and practice the use of effective nonverbal communication to help build stronger relationships with lab personnel, management and public health partners.

Communication Essentials: An Experiential Workshop on Messaging to Meet Your Laboratory’s Needs 
May 6, 2024, 8:00–11:15 am CDT 
Flyer Registration • $149 fee • 3 hours credit 

Lab work can be highly technical, but breaking down that important science into plain language is essential if you want to get those outside the lab—for example, legislators, funders and the public—behind your vision. This interactive workshop will not only teach you how to craft an effective message, but it will also give you experience presenting it.

Strategies and Model Practices for Hiring and Retaining the Best PHL Workforce Talent 
May 6, 2024, 8:00–11:30 am CDT 
Flyer Registration • $149 fee • 3 hours credit 

Hiring and retaining qualified public health laboratorians has long been a problem–and one that’s only been exacerbated by post-pandemic burnout, decreased funding and increasing work complexity. Building a robust public health workforce is essential for your current and future operations. How can you word job postings so they elicit response from top-tier applicants? How do you craft interview questions that lend themselves to insightful responses? What professional development offerings can you offer to staff to encourage them to stay? This workshop, intended for anyone who hires or onboards lab personnel, covers all that and more.

The post Getting to the APHL 2024 Annual Conference Early? Take Advantage of These Preconference Workshops appeared first on APHL Blog.

7 Public Health Lab Professionals Describe Why They Started in Lab Science—and What Makes Them Stay

Photos of seven individuals who work in public health laboratories.

By Donna Campisano, specialist, Communications, APHL

Preparing specimens. Identifying pathogens. Detecting outbreaks.

Working in a public health laboratory isn’t always pretty, but according to the lab professionals we talked with, it is incredibly important and rewarding.

“The tests we do to detect sexually transmitted infections, elevated blood lead levels, tuberculosis, COVID-19, arboviruses and tick-borne pathogens as well as contaminated recreational water make a difference every day in reducing exposure to or limiting the spread of infectious diseases,” said Leslie Wolf, Ph.D., laboratory technical director at the Louisville Department of Public Health & Wellness. “I believe this is core public health—knowing the risks in your community and finding solutions with community partners and collaborators to identify solutions to improve health.”

So, what got public health lab professionals like Wolf interested in lab science? And—more importantly—what keeps them dedicated to their jobs? What do they love about their work and what have their challenges been? In celebration of Lab Week, we asked seven lab scientists for their insights. This is what they had to say.

Mary Bonifas, quality assurance section manager, Bureau of Laboratories, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services:

“I worked on multiple projects with graduate students during my undergrad years, doing things like videotaping snails, tracking mice movements around barns and extracting and examining stomach contents of fish. The projects I enjoyed the most involved laboratory work, but I didn’t explore it. I thought the only career path for laboratory work was in a hospital setting. Although I enjoyed the lab, I stubbornly stuck with my zoology major, which I had decided on around the fourth grade. As fate would have it, my first ‘real science job’ happened to be in a commercial testing laboratory. I say fate because I just happened to be ready to get a job using that science degree, just happened to see that job posting and it just happened to be with a company that likes to hire new graduates. Within a few weeks of starting, I was hooked. The work was structured and organized, and the flow made perfect sense to my brain. I loved everything about it.”

Bernadette Matthis, laboratory director, Bureau of Laboratories, Philadelphia Department of Public Health:

“I love the mission of the work we do. We support the Philadelphia Health Department Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) that offer medical and laboratory services for those who are uninsured or underinsured, providing health equity to all our communities. We also provide STD testing so people can know their status and stay healthy. Our lab does surveillance work, so epidemiologists can know if there’s an outbreak of a particular infection circulating in the city. I love the fact that our lab is an important piece of a patient’s chart and that we’re making a difference in people’s lives.”

David Alejandro Silva, quality manager, Public Health Laboratory, Dallas County Health and Human Services:

“I’m exceedingly proud of all the remarkable growth my home public health lab has undergone over the years. I witnessed the resilience of our staff in response to the sustained stress of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Even in the heart of all that madness, we finally became a modern laboratory when we deployed our first-ever laboratory information management system (LIMS) that profoundly augmented our capabilities. Construction has begun on our new three-story laboratory; already, we have plans for new services, including the addition of a chemistry program. And even now, we are early adopters of incorporating generative AI in our day-to-day work and continue to look for more exciting applications. It has been, and continues to be, an exciting and deeply rewarding place to work.”

Ivan Dudik, IT liaison, Public Health Laboratory Division, Texas Department of State Health Services:

“If you’re interested in public health lab work, do it! It might not pay as well as other opportunities, but it is very fulfilling. It’s one of the few fields outside of first responders where you can see how your work helps save lives and improves patient outcomes. It’s excellent work for those seeking a team-oriented field that gives you room to become an expert. For those seeking laboratory informatics, I can tell you true that you will never be bored, and the work will always be challenging and fresh!”

Leslie Wolf, laboratory technical director, Louisville Department of Public Health & Wellness:

“One of the biggest challenges of my job is being prepared for the next big thing in public health. I have to predict what equipment the lab will need. Is what we currently use suitable? Will it have dual use? Will I have enough staff with the skills needed? What funding might be available? What partnerships can we develop locally to be prepared for current and future health issues? Being a visionary is not my strong suit, but APHL certainly helps me by providing critical information as fast as possible!” 

Andrew Cannons, laboratory director, Bureau of Public Health Laboratories – Tampa, Florida Department of Health:

“What I love the most about my job is the staff—they’re always ready to step up and meet the challenge! Staff are the most valuable resource.”

Brendan Reilly, manager, Laboratory LIMS and Informatics Group, Public Health Laboratory Division,  Texas Department of State Health Services:

“I had a degree in biochemistry but started working in the private sector in an IT job. And I really found myself not happy. A for-profit company just wasn’t a good fit for me, so I started looking for opportunities where I could use my science degree—and I stumbled upon public health laboratories. Ultimately, it all worked out. I found I really enjoyed going to work knowing I was contributing to more than just some private company’s bottom line.”

How can you explore public health laboratory careers or support those who are interested?

APHL offers students, early-career lab professionals and established public health laboratory scientists a variety of ways to explore careers in—and expand their knowledge of—public health laboratory work. As an organization, we offer professional development courses, webinars, symposiums, conferences and more. Additionally, the Career Pathways in Public Health Laboratory Science: an APHL-CDC Initiative includes the Public Health Laboratory Fellowship Program and the Public Health Laboratory Internship Program. Both programs are offer exciting opportunities for participants and for mentors!

The post 7 Public Health Lab Professionals Describe Why They Started in Lab Science—and What Makes Them Stay appeared first on APHL Blog.

Is That Salami Safe? Charcuterie Recalls and Consumer Safety Tips

Photo of a charcuterie board.

By Donna Campisano, specialist, Communications, APHL

Charcuterie is having a moment. Boards and trays loaded with cheeses, cured meats, nuts, olives, spreads, chocolates and pretty much anything your heart desires are everywhere—on restaurant menus, in grocery store deli cases and on kitchen islands from Tempe to Tampa and places in between.

But that board could be brimming with more than chevre and capicola.

In January, Fratelli Beretta, USA recalled ready-to-eat charcuterie meat products due to concerns they may be contaminated with Salmonella. The recall was initiated after the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), in partnership with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and state public health officials, investigated a multistate outbreak of Salmonella. According to CDC, 87 people in 30 states have been affected, although the number is likely higher as many people recover without seeking medical treatment.

Further investigation determined that under-processed Coppa meats, which are made from cured pork, are the likely source of the infection. The products in question include Busseto brand Charcuterie Sampler and Fratelli Beretta brand Antipasto Gran Beretta (you can find the complete list of recalled products here). Consumers should not eat, and retailers should not sell, these items.

Infection with Salmonella, which can cause diarrhea, abdominal cramps and fever, is just one of several dangers lurking on charcuterie boards. Another big one is Listeria monocytogenes, a bacterium that survives refrigeration and other food preservation techniques and can be found in deli meats and some cheeses. A Listeria infection can cause gastrointestinal issues, and, in severe cases, headaches, stiff neck and even convulsions. It is particularly dangerous to pregnant women, young children and the elderly.

So, can you have your charcuterie and eat it (safely) too? No food is 100% risk-free, but there are steps you can take to increase the chances your Coppa (and other charcuterie items) are copacetic.

  • Start with clean hands and utensils when preparing your charcuterie board.
  • Choose your cheeses carefully. Make sure they are made using pasteurized milk (pasteurization kills harmful bacteria). Unpasteurized cheeses are sometimes sold at places like farmer’s markets so be sure to check the labels.
  • Check expiration dates. Many cured meats have a long shelf life. Make sure what you’re serving hasn’t passed its prime.
  • Keep your charcuterie items refrigerated right up until serving (you can even assemble your board and pop it into the fridge until needed).
  • Replenish your board as items are eaten instead of piling it high with meats/cheeses that are allowed to sit unrefrigerated.
  • Discard all perishable foods that sit out longer than two hours.

APHL supports the public health laboratories that perform testing to identify the pathogens that cause foodborne diseases by training staff, improving the capabilities of member laboratories and collaborating with federal partners, such as CDC and Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Working through the Council to Improve Foodborne Outbreak Response (CIFOR), APHL maintains a strong role in enhancing communication and collaboration across the disciplines involved in investigating foodborne illness outbreaks.

The post Is That Salami Safe? Charcuterie Recalls and Consumer Safety Tips appeared first on APHL Blog.

Tuberculosis: Better Detection Techniques and Treatments for a Deadly Disease

Tuberculosis hides in plain sight.

By Donna Campisano, specialist, Communications, APHL

World TB Day is March 24

Before COVID-19 sprang on the scene, tuberculosis (TB) had the alarming distinction of being the world’s deadliest infectious disease. Now it ranks second, having claimed 1.3 million lives in 2022. While TB is less a problem in this country than other parts of the world, public health officials remain vigilant. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports that in 2022, TB incidence rates in this country were up 5.5% since 2021.

TB is a highly contagious disease caused by the bacterium Mycobacterium tuberculosis. It typically affects the lungs and is generally passed from person to person via airborne droplets—the kind that can spew when someone coughs, sneezes or speaks.

Public health laboratories play instrumental roles in fighting TB by identifying Mycobacterium tuberculosis and assessing the organism’s susceptibility to relevant drugs with the use and application of novel technologies. One of those technologies is next generation sequencing (NGS), which looks at the sequence of DNA present in a specimen to identify an organism and determine whether genetic mutations that may impact drug resistance are present. 

The Role of NGS in TB Detection

Key to curbing TB outbreaks is rapid detection and characterization of drug resistance. But that can be a challenge.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a slow-growing organism. Traditional methods used for detection and drug susceptibility testing depend on growth, but it can take weeks for a cultured sample to grow the bacterium. During that time, a patient may not be diagnosed or treated with appropriate drugs. That may be time that a patient isn’t limiting exposure to others, allowing infections to take root in communities.

But NGS may help slow the spread.

While NGS has been around for a while, [SB1] using it to gather clinical information is a relatively new application. NGS can not only identify the bacterium causing the disease, but it can also predict whether the bacterium isolated is resistant or susceptible to one of the anti-bacterial drugs used to treat TB. And it can do it all in a matter of days-to-weeks instead of the weeks-to-months it takes to grow a lab culture. That kind of timely, detailed diagnosis is essential not only in reducing community spread but also in eliminating the need for a patient to potentially utilize multiple costly and time-consuming treatment regimens before landing on the one that works.

More Treatment Options

Tuberculosis treatment can lasts months—sometimes as long as six-to-nine. And if the TB is drug resistant, treatment could linger on for up to two years. These long-in-duration treatment plans can be inconvenient for patients, making them more likely to abandon the drugs before they’ve taken full effect.

In 2022, CDC recommended the use of a multi-drug regimen called RPT-MOX for patients older than 12 with drug-susceptible pulmonary TB. Based on the results of an international clinical trial, researchers found that the four-month regimen was as effective in curing TB as the standard six-month method that had been one of the mainstays of treatment.

Another drug combination making news is BPaL, which in 2019 was US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for use in people with drug-resistant TB as well as in people who can’t tolerate standard treatments or show no improvement when using them.

BPaL appears highly effective in treating TB. In one study, 95 of 107 people saw improvement in six months of treatment and six months of post-treatment follow-up. Only slightly more than 1.3% of TB cases in this country are multi-drug resistant, but worldwide the number reaches 20%, says WHO.

APHL and TB Testing

In 2015, APHL, in collaboration with CDC, established a National PHL Drug Susceptibility (DST) Reference Center for Mycobacterium tuberculosis to provide quality-assured drug susceptibility testing for eligible US public health laboratories. In 2024, the reference center began utilizing NGS clinically to predict for resistance to standard first-line drugs as well as drugs used in the RPT-MOX and BPaL testing regimens.  The reference center acts as an extension of CDC’s Division of TB Elimination Laboratory Branch and provides drug-susceptibility testing for US public health laboratories with low volumes of testing (fewer than 50 isolates annually). Participation in the reference center is voluntary. CDC’s testing services remain available to all US TB programs.

The post Tuberculosis: Better Detection Techniques and Treatments for a Deadly Disease appeared first on APHL Blog.

Measles Outbreaks Still Occur: How the APHL/CDC VPD Reference Centers Are Working to Identify Them

1981 poster promoting measles vaccination that says, "Make Measles a Memory." Photo source: CDC

By Donna Campisano, specialist, Communications, APHL

A vaccine to prevent measles has been available since 1963. And yet this highly contagious disease, characterized by fever, respiratory symptoms and a telltale body rash, is still with us.

While measles is thought of as a childhood illness, its outcomes can be far from benign.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1 in 5 unvaccinated people who contract the virus will be hospitalized. One in every 20 children with the disease will develop pneumonia. And up to 3 of every 1,000 children infected will die from the neurological and respiratory complications measles cause.

Disease Outbreaks and the Role of Vaccine Preventable Disease Reference Centers

Thanks to a robust vaccination program, measles practically disappeared from this country and was declared eliminated in the US by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2000. But increased vaccine hesitancy and a return to global travel (most cases of measles in this country are imported from elsewhere) following the pandemic have officials concerned.

As of the first week in March, 45 measles cases from 17 jurisdictions have been reported to the CDC in 2024. Compare that to 58 total cases from 20 jurisdictions reported in all of 2023. Florida accounts for 10 of those cases, nine in one county alone. While the vast majority are children and teens, one is an adult. All 10 cases were reported in February, demonstrating how quickly cases can spread. And more cases are popping up every day. The CDC recently sent a team to Chicago to help with a measles outbreak clustered mostly in a migrant shelter. Eight cases have been confirmed in about as many days.

While the number of cases reported thus far in this country isn’t staggering, the same can’t be said for other parts of the world where vaccination rates are particularly dismal. According to WHO, measles cases increased 18% globally from 2021 to 2022 and deaths jumped by 43%.

In 2013, APHL, in partnership with CDC, established four Vaccine Preventable Diseases (VPD) Reference Centers to help reduce the diagnostic load of state laboratories and assist with the pathogen typing that’s necessary to detect the origin and spread of disease outbreaks.

These four centers—located in California, New York, Wisconsin and Minnesota—perform molecular testing for the viruses that cause measles, mumps, rubella (German measles), chickenpox, enterovirus (which can cause diseases like polio and hepatitis A) and MERS-CoV (Middle East respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus). The Wisconsin and Minnesota centers also perform bacterial pathogen testing.

Testing, both diagnostic and characterization, is performed using standardized methods developed by CDC and is available to public health departments free of charge. Submitting sites are assigned to one or two VPD Reference Centers depending on what services they need. Test results are reported to the submitting site and to CDC.

Detecting Outbreaks in Real Time

How do VPD Reference Centers help curb outbreaks?

To reduce vaccine-preventable diseases like measles and the burden they cause, officials—from clinicians to public health professionals to lab scientists—need details about what diseases are circulating where. And the more immediate the information, the more immediate a response.

To that end, APHL will be launching a VPD dashboard in the next few months. The VPD Reference Centers will submit monthly or bimonthly data reports to APHL detailing the number of specimens submitted to them for testing, how many tests were performed per pathogen and the number of positive specimens detected. That information will be fed into the publicly available dashboard.

The dashboard, along with the rapid detection of disease provided by member labs and the outreach conducted by public health officials, will play a pivotal role in responding to disease outbreaks. APHL and CDC will continue to work together to provide training and improve knowledge in identifying and curtailing disease outbreaks, whatever form they take, wherever they erupt.

The post Measles Outbreaks Still Occur: How the APHL/CDC VPD Reference Centers Are Working to Identify Them appeared first on APHL Blog.

Applesauce Tainted with Lead Chromate: What We Know and Next Steps

Photo showing three applesauce pouches

By Donna Campisano, specialist, Communications, APHL

Applesauce is a pantry staple and a favorite snack among toddlers.

But lately applesauce, specifically cinnamon applesauce packaged in squeeze pouches, has been making headlines—and for alarming reasons.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and state and local partners are investigating a link between elevated blood lead levels (BLLs) ≥3.5 µg/dL in children consuming certain cinnamon-containing apple purée and applesauce products manufactured in Ecuador.

Consumers should be aware of these elevated levels and the potential for adverse health effects.

What’s been recalled?

Ecuadorian food manufacturer Austrofoods has voluntarily recalled its WanaBana Apple Cinnamon Fruit Puree Pouches, regardless of expiration date and lot code. Two additional brands of products are also subject to recall: certain Schnucks cinnamon-flavored applesauce pouches and variety pack and certain Weis cinnamon applesauce pouches.

These products were sold through multiple retailers, including Dollar Tree and Amazon.

Consumers should not eat, and retailers should not sell nor serve, the recalled brands of apple cinnamon fruit pouches.

What started the recall?

This recall started with a joint investigation by the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, local health departments and the North Carolina Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services after the NC State Laboratory of Public Health identified three children with high blood lead levels in the western portion of the state.

An in-home investigator made the applesauce/lead connection after observing identical products in the pantries of two children reported to have elevated blood lead levels. The NCDHHS then identified WanaBana Apple Cinnamon Fruit Puree pouches as a potential shared source of exposure and reported their finding to the FDA. As part of the investigation, NCDHHS analyzed multiple lots of the product, detecting extremely high concentrations of lead. The FDA has reviewed and supports the NCDHHS’ findings.

Early in the FDA’s investigation, it leveraged the capability and capacity of the Laboratory Flexible Funding Model (LFFM) laboratories. The LLFM is a cooperative agreement between the FDA and state human and animal food testing laboratories. The intent of the agreement is to increase the ability of states to generate actionable data and ensure the safety of the US food supply.

An email and next-day emergency call resulted in 12 LFFM laboratories pivoting their sampling efforts. In four business days, 97 samples were collected for testing. Laboratories were instructed to collect both cinnamon-containing and non-cinnamon-containing products; some laboratories were also asked to perform XRF testing (an X-ray technique that can show what elements a compound contains) on the purée packaging to help isolate the contamination source.

How big is the problem?

State health departments receive reports of potential cases from various sources, and then follow up to determine whether the case definition is met. When a case definition is met, the state health department then reports the case to the CDC.

To be considered in CDC’s case count, the person must have had a blood lead level of 3.5 ug/dL or higher measured within three months after consuming a recalled WanaBana, Schnucks or Weis brand fruit purée product after November 2022.

As of Feb. 24, 2024, the CDC has received 111 confirmed cases of elevated blood lead levels in people consuming these products as well as 320 probable cases and 37 suspected cases for a total of 468 cases from 44 different states. As of Jan. 30, 2024, the FDA has received 90 confirmed complaints/reports of adverse events potentially linked to recalled product.

The median age of those affected is one year.

It’s important to note that the CDC and FDA have different data sources, so the counts reported by each agency will not directly correspond. In addition, some people who were affected by the contaminated product might be reflected in both the numbers reported by the FDA and the numbers reported by CDC, so the numbers should not be added together.

How did the applesauce get contaminated?

The FDA completed an onsite inspection of the Austrofoods facility located in Ecuador, testing samples of the cinnamon used in the recalled applesauce pouches. The highest result was 5,110 parts per million (ppm), which was more than 2,000 times the level of 2.5 ppm being considered for bark spices (including cinnamon) by the international standard-setting body, Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex).

The FDA has identified lead chromate found in the cinnamon of these products to be the source of contamination. Lead chromate is a lead-and-chromium-containing compound with yellow, red or orange pigments, depending on the type. The FDA hypothesizes that the lead chromate was illegally and deliberately added to the cinnamon by the supplier to increase the cinnamon’s weight and enhance its color.

While the CDC reports that the health effects of chromium consumption are difficult to predict in this scenario, there is no safe level of lead.

The FDA does not need an action level or guidance to act when food contains a harmful substance, such as lead, that may render the food injurious to health. However, the agency has limited authority over foreign ingredient suppliers who do not directly ship their products to the U.S. Thus, the FDA has reduced ability to take direct action against Negasmart (the supplier of cinnamon to Austrofoods)  or Carlos Aguilera (the processor of the cinnamon sticks).

Carlos Aguilera is currently not in operation.

What’s next?

Anyone who may have eaten the affected products should talk with their healthcare provider.

Lead is toxic to humans and can affect people of any age or health status. Protecting children from exposure to lead is particularly important because they are more susceptible to lead toxicity. Most children have no obvious immediate signs of lead toxicity, but when symptoms do develop, they can include:

  • problems with learning, behavior, hearing and/or speech
  • slowed growth
  • lower IQ
  • physical symptoms, such as abdominal pain, weakness, anemia, seizures and even coma

Ask your healthcare provider about having your child tested for lead. If your child has elevated lead levels, your healthcare provider will recommend next steps.

If this investigation has you wondering about the safety of other cinnamon, you aren’t alone. FDA and state LFFM laboratories have expanded cinnamon testing beyond the recalled products. FDA has determined that certain ground cinnamon products do contain elevated levels of lead. While the levels detected in other products are only slightly elevated, prolonged exposure to these products may be unsafe.

This investigation is discussed in detail in the APHL/CSTE webinar, “Collaborative Insights: Detecting Lead and Chromium in Cinnamon Fruit Pureés,” which you can access in the APHL Learning Center.

APHL has guidance available to public health laboratories implementing a lower reference value for blood lead.

The post Applesauce Tainted with Lead Chromate: What We Know and Next Steps appeared first on APHL Blog.

New Lab Matters: Public health on the frontier

Lab Matters magazine masthead

Most public health laboratories across the US share the same challenges, such as lack of sustained funding and worries over staff recruitment and retention. But laboratories in more rural areas and remote locations, or in large states with sparse populations, have their own unique set of challenges. These circumstances often necessitate ingenuity, independence and creativity, as seen in this issue’s feature article.

Also in this issue:

Read the full issue.

Subscribe and get Lab Matters delivered to your inbox, or read Lab Matters on your mobile device.

The post New Lab Matters: Public health on the frontier appeared first on APHL Blog.

What is CIFOR and how does it prevent foodborne disease outbreaks?

The Council to Improve Foodborne Outbreak Response (CIFOR) logo

In 2018, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) approximated the economic burden of foodborne illness to be $17.6 million. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that each year one in six Americans get sick – with 128,000 becoming hospitalized and 3,000 dying – from foodborne illness.

The Council to Improve Foodborne Outbreak Response (CIFOR) helps lessen these health and economic burdens by improving outbreak detection methods, laboratory testing efficiencies, investigation tools and procedures, and control strategies. These improvements allow for the rapid detection of sick individuals and connect those illnesses to contaminated food products, thereby preventing the spread of foodborne disease outbreaks or even stopping them from happening.

What is CIFOR?

CIFOR is a multi-disciplinary group of public health professionals formed in 2006. The council includes federal agencies and national professional organizations whose staff and members have an interest in and responsibility for controlling foodborne disease outbreaks in the United States.

CIFOR was formed to identify barriers to the rapid detection of and response to foodborne disease outbreaks and develops projects that address these barriers. CIFOR members work collaboratively to develop model programs and products that facilitate investigation and control of foodborne disease outbreaks. They also work to improve performance and coordination in foodborne disease investigations across all levels of government.

CIFOR’s flagship product is the Guidelines to Improve Foodborne Disease Outbreak Response, otherwise known as CIFOR Guidelines.

Initially published in 2009, the CIFOR Guidelines are a comprehensive source of information on foodborne disease investigation and control for local, state, territorial, tribal and federal health agencies. The guidelines describe model practices for preparing for, detecting, investigating and controlling foodborne disease outbreaks and define the roles key organizations play in these activities.

The Third Edition of CIFOR Guidelines for Foodborne Disease Outbreak Response was released in the fall of 2020. This version incorporates several changes regarding disease surveillance, laboratory testing and outbreak detection practices since the first and second editions were published. The CIFOR Toolkit was updated in 2020 to reflect the changes in the third edition of the guidelines.

What is APHL’s role in CIFOR?

The Association of Public Health Laboratories (APHL) is a founding member of CIFOR. APHL represents the state and local government laboratory perspective within the council and provides key insight on the barriers to rapid laboratory detection and response to foodborne illness.

The focus of APHL’s work is to help strengthen laboratory systems. One way in which APHL accomplishes this is by providing necessary training to laboratory personnel and other key partners.

Working closely with CIFOR members, APHL created the CIFOR Learning Modules to provide a high-level overview of the concepts and best practices covered in the CIFOR Guidelines.  Here are five things you should know about the CIFOR Learning Modules:  

  1. Based on the Third Edition of the CIFOR Guidelines to Improve Foodborne Disease Outbreak Response, published in 2020.
  2. Designed for any public health practitioner involved in the detection, investigation, control or prevention of foodborne illness outbreaks.
  3. Free!
  4. Can be found in the APHL Learning Center. Log in with your APHL account, or if you don’t have one, create one quickly for free!
  5. Provide 2.5 contact hour(s) of continuing education for laboratorians who successfully complete this training by October 23, 2025.

The post What is CIFOR and how does it prevent foodborne disease outbreaks? appeared first on APHL Blog.

Nashville-based laboratory interns and mentors achieve perfect harmony

Photos of Kamren Williams and Mytasia Stone, two Public Health Laboratory Internship Program participants.

By Rudolph Nowak, senior specialist, communications, APHL

The Association of Public Health Laboratories (APHL), in collaboration with the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), launched the Public Health Laboratory Internship Program: an APHL-CDC Initiative in March 2023. The program offers paid internships that provide an opportunity for current students to gain basic laboratory science skills by working alongside a mentor at a public health laboratory.

Since its inception, the internship program focused on recruiting underrepresented students into the public health laboratory career field. To facilitate these efforts, APHL continually cultivates partnerships between minority-serving academic institutions and their local public health laboratories, encouraging students to apply to the internship program. Early outcomes are showing that this approach is working.

One of these partnerships is between Tennessee State University (TSU), a Historically Black College and University (HBCU), and the Tennessee Department of Health, Division of Laboratory Services (TDH Laboratory Services). As a direct result of this relationship, TDH Laboratory Services is currently hosting three TSU students as interns. Below we delve into the experiences of two mentors from TDH Laboratory Services and two interns from TSU. These conversations highlight the unique contributions of mentors and interns and the program’s effectiveness in nurturing talent.

A TAILORED EXPERIENCE

Mytasia Stone, currently in her second year of TSU’s Master of Public Health program after completing her bachelor’s degree from the same institution, is interested in pursuing a career in epidemiology. She pursued this internship “to experience the background side of epidemiology.” Stone’s mentor, Kristin Dunaway, has tailored the experience to her interest in epidemiology by including Stone in various meetings with other epidemiologists and helping Stone network with other laboratory staff, “[my mentor] has introduced me to everyone in the building.”

At the forefront of her responsibilities is water testing, a domain she entered without any prior experience. Stone learned every step during the first two months of her internship, and now she is able to run the water tests independently. Stone also specified the internship has helped her improve her technical writing abilities. Stone recently extended her internship and is looking forward to working on COVID-19 wastewater surveillance with her mentor.

Dunaway, who works in the Environmental Microbiology Lab, has been impressed with Mytasia’s commitment to learning and underscored how helpful having an intern is to her own workload. She added, “all of her work is done efficiently and has helped quicken processes.” Dunaway has most enjoyed witnessing Mytasia getting first-time experience with different laboratory tasks, “she gets a smile on her face, and you can tell she’s really having fun.”

The internship program not only provides valuable hands-on experience but also cultivates a tailored and enriching journey for participants like Stone, fostering a passion for their chosen fields within public health laboratories.

UNMASKING A NEW CAREER: A PATH TO PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORIES

Kamren Williams, a recent bachelor’s degree recipient from TSU, vividly recalls his introduction to the world of public health laboratories from an APHL staff member at a career fair at TSU. That encounter led to an internship under the guidance of Julie Viruez, the training coordinator in the Operations Department. He appreciated how this program exposed him to a different career path he previously did not know existed.

Julie Viruez, a seasoned professional with over 13 years at TDH Laboratory Services, embraced the role of mentorship for the first time. Although hesitant to become a mentor, she has “thoroughly enjoyed being a mentor to Kamren” and described Kamren as “friendly, motivated, and interested to learn everything about public health.” The opportunity to increase awareness about what public health labs do and to be “a part of [Williams’] career trajectory” were some of the most rewarding aspects for Julie. She hopes to continue serving as a mentor in the program.

PARTNERSHIPS FOSTER DIVERSITY IN PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORIES

This successful partnership between TSU and TDH Laboratory Services has proven how crucial face-to-face recruitment activities are in exposing more students to careers in public health laboratories. The collaborative efforts of APHL in forming partnerships with minority-serving institutions and public health laboratories stand as a testament to their commitment to inspiring more underrepresented students to pursue the various careers within the realms of public health laboratories.

The post Nashville-based laboratory interns and mentors achieve perfect harmony appeared first on APHL Blog.