The publisher Frontiers has retracted four papers in three of its journals after discovering they had been accepted with fake peer reviews. The problem of fake reviews has been on the research community’s radar since at least 2014, and several major publishers—including Springer, SAGE and BioMed Central—have retracted hundreds of papers accepted via fake peer […]
The post Publisher issues first retractions for fake peer review, starts new checking policy appeared first on Retraction Watch.
PLOS ONE has retracted two 2014 papers from a group of researchers, after an institutional investigation confirmed image duplication. Although the authors initially asked to correct the figures in the two papers, they ultimately agreed with the decision to retract. Mrinal K. Maiti—an associate professor at the Indian Institute of Technology at Kharagpur and corresponding author […]
The post PLOS ONE retracts two papers one year after author says he okayed the move appeared first on Retraction Watch.
A physics journal says it has planned for several months to retract a 2006 paper by a prominent researcher with multiple retractions, after a concerned reader notified the editor about extensive duplication. But, more than seven months after receiving the complaint, the journal Thin Solid Films has not yet taken action. So what’s taking so […]
The post A physics journal agreed to retract a paper several months ago. It’s still not retracted. appeared first on Retraction Watch.
Title: Nobel Prize Physiology 2017 (for their discoveries of molecular mechanisms controlling the circadian rhythm) is On Fiction as There Is No Molecular Mechanisms of Biological Clock Controlling the Circadian Rhythm. Circadian Rhythm Is Triggered and Controlled By Divine Mechanism (CCP – Time Mindness (TM) Real Biological Clock) in Life Sciences What Caught Our Attention: This isn’t a retraction — rather, it’s […]
The post Caught Our Notice: A nearly unreadable paper criticizing 2017 Nobel pick appeared first on Retraction Watch.
The editors of a new journal resigned earlier this month, claiming that one of the publishers had cold feet about launching the journal. The publishers, however, tell a different story. To be honest, we’re a bit confused about what happened. The editors—Apoorvanand Jha and Dhruva Narayan—claim that India’s Council for Social Development (CSD), which […]
The post Editors resign before launch of new journal. What went wrong? appeared first on Retraction Watch.
A physics journal has retracted a 2014 paper after a reader discovered a slew of errors. The paper, published in the Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, explored how the properties of nanofluids—fluids that contain nanoparticles—change as the fluid moves through different materials. According to the editor-in-chief, Greg Naterer, an outside expert—Asterios Pantokratoras, based […]
The post “The results are essentially meaningless:” Typos, missing variables found throughout physics paper appeared first on Retraction Watch.
A chemistry journal has issued expressions of concern for three papers after a reader notified the editors of “unexplained discrepancies” in the data. According to the notices, after the editors of Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry confirmed the problems, they contacted the corresponding author on the three papers, Pradeep Kumar—who works at the Council of Scientific and Industrial […]
The post Chem journal cautions readers about data in three papers appeared first on Retraction Watch.