Category Archives: Post-publication evaluation
Signing Critical Peer Reviews & the Fear of Retaliation: What Should We Do?
Live Blogging #PeerRevWk17 Day 3: Innovations in Peer Review and Scientific Publishing
Posted by featured, journals, peer review, Post-publication evaluation, science communication
in3 Things Expressions of Concern Reveal About the Research Publication System
The Science Opinion Games: New Conversations, Same Old Voices?
“Women scientists seem to be underrepresented in science activities that make their reflections public.” I wrote that glum-making sentence. It was in an editorial for PLOS Medicine about post-publication culture. The studies that led me to this conclusion are cited there: under-representation … Continue reading
The post The Science Opinion Games: New Conversations, Same Old Voices? appeared first on PLOS Blogs Network.
Science’s Water Coolers: Turning Up the Volume On Journal Clubs
London, 1835 – 1854. Sometimes they just played cards. But mostly, they would gather in a small room over a baker’s shop and read journals. The doctors had formed “a kind of club” because the hospital library didn’t have a … Continue reading
The post Science’s Water Coolers: Turning Up the Volume On Journal Clubs appeared first on PLOS Blogs Network.
Posted by Post-publication evaluation, PubMed Commons, science communication
in