A commonly used questionnaire designed to predict how well patients will stick to their drug regimen is stirring up some controversy in the publishing world. Over the last decade, the creator of the copyrighted questionnaire — public health specialist Donald Morisky of the University of California, Los Angeles — has aggressively pursued any researcher who uses […]
The post Pay to play: Scientists are bristling over the cost of a common research tool appeared first on Retraction Watch.
CHICAGO — As many Retraction Watch readers may know, the Peer Review Congress happens every four years — much like the Olympics. For three days here on the shores of Lake Michigan, researchers will present findings on subjects from bias to data sharing to misconduct. Our Ivan Oransky is there, and will be tweeting, so […]
The post The Olympics of research into scientific publishing is happening now. Follow along here. appeared first on Retraction Watch.
A recent pre-print showed that scientists in China can earn up to $165,000 to publish a paper in a top journal, but that’s not the only place where researchers can get some extra cash. Recently, we conducted an informal search for other institutions around the world that offer cash prizes for publishing research — and […]
The post Paid to publish: It’s not just China appeared first on Retraction Watch.
August 3rd is a big day around here — it’s our birthday. Today, we celebrate seven years since two science journalists decided, not exactly on whim but close to it, to launch a blog about retractions. Little did they know. (To hear our co-founder Ivan Oransky talk more about this milestone, check out his podcast […]
The post Happy birthday to Retraction Watch! (We’re 7.) And an update on our database. appeared first on Retraction Watch.
Regular Retraction Watch readers may recall a remarkable story from January involving Harvard’s Lee Rubin and one of his graduate students. As we reported in Science at the time, the graduate student, Gustavo German, said he had been subjected to a forced psychiatric evaluation as “an act of revenge by Rubin, retaliation prompted by German’s […]
The post The Harvard lab head, the grad student, and the restraining order: An ongoing saga appeared first on Retraction Watch.
Did you miss some of this week’s posts? Here they all are, in one handy roundup: Are there foxes in Tasmania? Follow the poop Lancet retracts (and replaces) paper a year after authors report error that changes “all numbers” Lost in translation: Authors blame a language error for wrong diagnosis More notices appear for embattled […]
The post The RW week in review: Doing the right thing, two journals’ first retractions appeared first on Retraction Watch.
Please welcome Andrew P. Han, the newest addition to the Retraction Watch team. Andy comes to Retraction Watch and the Center for Scientific Integrity from GenomeWeb, where he covered the explosion of CRISPR/Cas9 into the research and biotech scene over the last several years. He has also freelanced for Wired.com, Popular Mechanics.com, Newsweek, and Food […]
The post Meet our new staff writer, Andrew P. Han appeared first on Retraction Watch.
It takes a lot of work to clean up the scientific literature, and some researchers and organizations deserve special recognition. That’s why we’ve established a “doing the right thing” category when we see praise-worthy progress in individual retractions, and have now gone a step further: We’ve created the DiRT Award, a new annual prize to […]
The post Announcing the DiRT Award, a new “doing the right thing” prize — and its first recipient appeared first on Retraction Watch.
We’re very pleased to announce an 18-month grant renewal for $325,000 from The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust to The Center For Scientific Integrity, our parent non-profit organization. The generous funding from the Helmsley Charitable Trust will allow us to build on the work funded by our original Helmsley grant. That grant gave us the opportunity to […]
The post Thank you, Helmsley Charitable Trust: $325,000 grant renewal will help us build a sustainable future appeared first on Retraction Watch.
Eve Armstrong had an important question: How would things have turned out if she had summoned the nerve to ask a certain Barry Cottonfield to her high school’s junior prom in 1997? Cottonfield, for those readers unfamiliar, “was a brash, unprincipled individual (private communications 1983-1998; Lunch Ladies’ Assoc. v. Cottonfield 1995) with slightly below-average learning […]
The post “Publications of questionable scientific value:” A scientist models a potential prom date appeared first on Retraction Watch.