I have written before about the presentation of historical information using the pictorial representation of a phylogeny (eg. Phylogenetic networks outside science
; Another phylogenetic network outside science
). These diagrams are often representations of the evolutionary history of human artifacts, and so a phylogeny is quite appropriate. They are of interest because:
- they are usually hybridization networks, rather than divergent trees, because the artifact ideas involve horizontal transfer (ideas added) and recombination (ideas replaced);
- they are often not time consistent, because ideas can leap forward in time, so that the reticulations do not connect contemporary artifacts (see Time inconsistency in evolutionary networks); and
- they are sometimes drawn badly, in the sense that the diagram does not reflect the history in a consistent way.
The latter point often involves poor indication of the time direction (see Direction is important when showing history
), or involves subdividing the network into a set of linearized trees.
One particularly noteworthy example that I have previously discussed is of the GNU/Linux Distribution Timeline
, which illustrates the complex history of the computer operating system. The problems with this diagram as a phylogeny are discussed in the blog post section History of Linux distributions
In this new post I will simply point out that there is
a more acceptable diagram, showing the key Unix and Unix-like operating systems
. I have reproduced a copy of it below.
|Click to enlarge.|
This version of the information correctly shows the history as a network, not a series of linearized trees (each with a central axis). It also draws the reticulations in an informative manner, rather than having them be merely artistic fancies.
It is good to know that phylogenetic diagrams can be drawn well, even outside biology and linguistics.