orcid.org/0000-0001-8771-7239 In a new report, a group convened by the US National Academy of Sciences and including a dozen journal editors reflects on authorship guidelines and recommends new ways to make author contributions more transparent.Category Archives: transparency
PLOS Collaborates on Recommendations to Improve Transparency for Author Contributions
orcid.org/0000-0001-8771-7239 In a new report, a group convened by the US National Academy of Sciences and including a dozen journal editors reflects on authorship guidelines and recommends new ways to make author contributions more transparent.Posted by in advocacy, Assessment, authorship, credit, featured, ORCID, PNAS, Publishing, Thought Leaders, transparency
To Sign or Not to Sign: A Slice of Transparency in Peer Review
0000-0002-8715-28960000-0001-7318-5892 Scientists depend on the proper evaluation of research that creates the foundation for future work, and the public expects curated scientific content to be trustworthy. All forms of peer review, whether for ethical, technicalPosted by in Assessment, early career researcher, Events, featured, open science, peer review, Publishing, transparency
The Fight Over Transparency: Round Two
By Paul D. Thacker and Charles Seife The backlash against transparency is now underway. The battles being waged are likely to leave their mark over how to perform — and how to interpret — the medical and scientific literature for … Continue reading
The post The Fight Over Transparency: Round Two appeared first on PLOS Blogs Network.