In which, Rep. Rice plays to my vanity

I know it is boring, but it is my policy to publicly post any correspondence I receive from one of my elected representatives, especially the form letters. This one is from Representative Tom Rice, who represents those of us living in South Carolina’s House District 7, on the topic of NSA domestic spying.

In addition to voting the way I wanted him to on HR4870 to stop funding for certain NSA surveillance programs, Representative Rice called me “Dr. Witten”. No one ever calls me “Dr. Witten”, including most of my students.

Dear Dr. Witten:

Thank you for contacting me to express your concerns regarding H.R. 4870, the Department of Defense Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2015. I appreciate you taking the time to share your views with me, and I apologize for the delay in my response.

This is an important issue, and I have heard from many constituents who feel the same way as you do. Recent disclosures of the extent of government spying, both on our allies and American citizens are shocking and disturbing. It is now undisputed that the NSA has gathered our telephone records and emails for years (although they say blanket email gathering has now been discontinued). Everyone recognizes that in order to protect our national security, we must watch our enemies. Leaders at the NSA tell us that their surveillance activities have foiled over 50 acts of terrorism in recent years. However, we must strike a reasonable balance between measures necessary to protect our national security interests on the one hand, and our constitutionally guaranteed right to privacy on the other. I believe that the current level of surveillance goes too far. We must do more to protect the privacy of Americans.

As you may know, Representative Massie (R-KY) introduced an amendment to H.R. 4870 which prohibits funds from being used to fully exploit lawfully collected foreign intelligence information collected under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. I was proud to vote in favor of this amendment, which the House of Representatives passed on June 19, 2014. H.R. 4870 passed the House and now awaits a vote in the Senate. As the United States House of Representatives continues to protect our citizens’ privacy , I will keep your thoughts in mind. While there are many Members of Congress with different backgrounds and constituencies, please know that I will fight to represent your interests and those of the Seventh Congressional District of South Carolina.

For up-to-date information about where I stand on some of the most pressing issues facing South Carolinians and the nation today, please visit my website- http://rice.house.gov. From there, you will be able to sign up for my e-mail newsletter, Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube pages, all of which will provide you with regular updates on what I am doing in Washington, D.C. to better the Seventh District.

I understand your time is valuable, and I thank you for reaching out to me. It is an honor to represent the Pee Dee and Grand Strand, and if I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,
Tom Rice
Member of Congress


Filed under: Items of Interest Tagged: house of representatives, NSA, spying, Tom Rice

The Representative Disapproves

Representative Jackie Speier (CA, 14th District) has taken Science Magazine to task (PDF of full letter here) for their controversial cover and controversial response to criticism of that cover.

The July ll issue of Science Magazine featured a lurid cover photograph of transgender women in tight dresses and high heels with their heads cropped out of the frame.

She rightfully questions not only the choice, which dehumanizes transgender individuals and works against making science a welcoming environment for diverse individuals, but the perspectives of the senior editorial staff of Science Magazine, who failed to exercise reasonable judgment on this cover choice.

I appreciate the apology from Science ’s editor-in-chíef, but question how such a sexist, racist, and transphobic cover was selected in the first place.

The fact that the poobahs at Science Magazine seemed surprised by the response implies quite a few unpleasant things about the decision-making process. She also extends responsibility to Science Magazine‘s parent organization, the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Importantly, Representative Speier has not simply registered a complaint. She has demanded a substantive response, which I suspect Science Magazine will be more likely to act on than any letters I send.

As one of the nation’s preeminent science organizations, I expect you will take action to eradicate harassment and inequality in the scientific community. Please reply with the specific steps you will take to become part of the solution, instead of a contributor to the problem.

It also has footnotes.


Filed under: Follies of the Human Condition Tagged: house of representatives, Jackie Speier, Linkonomicon, science, science magazine, transgender

Science in the “national interest”

LS

Representative Lamar Smith supports legislation to make NSF ensure each grantee is pursuing science in the national interest. Image courtesy of Wikipedia.

A particularly concerning piece of legislation is making its way around the House of Representatives. This bill would require that the National Science Foundation (NSF) justify each grant it awards with respect to its contributions to protect the “national interest”. Earlier in the year, a similar bill was proposed with an extremely limited definition of what would meet “national interest” criteria. While the current bill has expanded its definition of national interest to include economic competitiveness, health and welfare, scientific literacy, partnerships between academia and industry, promotion of scientific progress and national defense, legislation like this should be getting all scientists up in arms.

Predicting which avenues of science will lead to major breakthroughs in health or energy is almost impossible. This bill would severely limit early exploratory work that has yet to prove it is in the national interest. This political interference in the operation of the scientific enterprise  is a very dangerous door to open. Decisions of what is in the national interest can very quickly become influenced by party politics and the interests of lobbyists. While it is important that NSF funds good proposals of sound science, requiring immediate association with national interest will lead to exaggerated claims by scientists and the exclusion of some of the future’s greatest breakthroughs.

Whether you are a scientist or not, reach out to your representative and let them know how this qualifier will negatively affect the scientific enterprise in the United States. If you don’t know who your representative is, you can find that information here.


Filed under: Follies of the Human Condition Tagged: grant funding, house of representatives, lobbyists, national interest, NSF, Politics

Science in the “national interest”

LS

Representative Lamar Smith supports legislation to make NSF ensure each grantee is pursuing science in the national interest. Image courtesy of Wikipedia.

A particularly concerning piece of legislation is making its way around the House of Representatives. This bill would require that the National Science Foundation (NSF) justify each grant it awards with respect to its contributions to protect the “national interest”. Earlier in the year, a similar bill was proposed with an extremely limited definition of what would meet “national interest” criteria. While the current bill has expanded its definition of national interest to include economic competitiveness, health and welfare, scientific literacy, partnerships between academia and industry, promotion of scientific progress and national defense, legislation like this should be getting all scientists up in arms.

Predicting which avenues of science will lead to major breakthroughs in health or energy is almost impossible. This bill would severely limit early exploratory work that has yet to prove it is in the national interest. This political interference in the operation of the scientific enterprise  is a very dangerous door to open. Decisions of what is in the national interest can very quickly become influenced by party politics and the interests of lobbyists. While it is important that NSF funds good proposals of sound science, requiring immediate association with national interest will lead to exaggerated claims by scientists and the exclusion of some of the future’s greatest breakthroughs.

Whether you are a scientist or not, reach out to your representative and let them know how this qualifier will negatively affect the scientific enterprise in the United States. If you don’t know who your representative is, you can find that information here.


Filed under: Follies of the Human Condition Tagged: grant funding, house of representatives, lobbyists, national interest, NSF, Politics