Former rising star found guilty of misconduct issues 2nd retraction

A once-lauded researcher in the field of infectious disease — who has since been found guilty of misconduct — has retracted a second paper. Last year, the University of Dundee in Scotland investigated and ultimately concluded that Robert Ryan — whose work focused on infections that can be deadly in people with lung diseases such as cystic fibrosis […]

The post Former rising star found guilty of misconduct issues 2nd retraction appeared first on Retraction Watch.

E. coli gene paper falls to mistaken mutation

Researchers in Germany have retracted their 2011 article in the Journal of Bacteriology after another lab pointed out a fatal error in the paper. The article, “Escherichia coli Exports Cyclic AMP via TolC,” came from a group at Tübingen University led by Klaus Hantke. The paper focuses on the crucial role of the membrane channel […]

The post E. coli gene paper falls to mistaken mutation appeared first on Retraction Watch.

Post-doc fired after explaining image problems in paper to Retraction Watch

We reported last week on a Portuguese group that lost two papers over mislabeled image files. Now, we’ve learned that first author Christian Ramos has been fired after speaking to Retraction Watch and offering what seemed like a heartfelt apology (which you can read here). We’ve reached out to principal investigator Jorge Leitão at the University of […]

“This situation left me ashamed and infuriated with myself:” Scientist retracts two papers

A Portuguese group has retracted two papers in the Journal of Bacteriology after mislabeled computer files led to the wrong images being used. And, we’ve learned in a heartfelt email, the first author was devastated. Here’s the notice for “MtvR Is a Global Small Noncoding Regulatory RNA in Burkholderia cenocepacia”: A number of problems related to images […]

Two Journal of Bacteriology papers retracted for data duplication spanning five years

j bacteriolA group of bacteria researchers in Spain and Germany has lost two papers in the Journal of Bacteriology after the journal found evidence that they had reused figures.

The two notices, for “Heat Shock Proteome Analysis of Wild-Type Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 and a Spontaneous Mutant Lacking GroEL1, a Dispensable Chaperone” and “Transcriptional Analysis of the groES-groEL1, groEL2, and dnaK genes in Corynebacterium glutamicum: Characterization of Heat Shock-Induced Promoters,” say the same thing:

This article has been retracted at the request of the Journal of Bacteriology because identical bands for the 16S rRNA probe controls in the Northern blots were reported to correspond to experiments using different strains and experimental conditions in articles published in this journal and in Microbiology over a period of 5 years, i.e., the following:

C. Barreiro, E. González-Lavado, M. Pátek, and J.-F. Martín, J. Bacteriol. 186:4813–4817, 2004. doi:10.1128/JB.186.14.4813–4817.2004.

C. Barreiro, E. González-Lavado, S. Brand, A. Tauch, and J. F. Martín, J. Bacteriol. 187:884–889, 2005. doi:10.1128/JB.187.3.884–889.2005.

M. Barriuso-Iglesias, C. Barreiro, F. Flechoso, and J. F. Martín, Microbiology 152:11–21, 2006. doi:10.1099/mic.0.28383-0.

C. Barreiro, D. Nakunst, A. T. Hüser, H. D. de Paz, J. Kalinowski, and J. F. Martín, Microbiology 155:359–372, 2009. doi:10.1099/mic.0.019299-0.

Drs. Barreiro and Martín take sole responsibility for these instances of data duplication and would like to apologize to the readers, reviewers, and editors of both the Journal of Bacteriology and Microbiology.

The papers have each been cited 34 times, according to Thomson Scientific’s Web of Knowledge.

The American Society for Microbiology (ASM), which publishes the Journal of Bacteriology, tells Retraction Watch:

A reader alerted Dr. Agnès Fouet, Editor in Chief of Microbiology, and Dr. Thomas Silhavy, Editor in Chief of the Journal of Bacteriology about possible problems with the data in the four papers.  ASM production staff examined the figures in the JB papers for evidence of image duplication using ORI forensic tools and confirmed that the images for the control 16S rRNA probe from the 2004 JB paper were reused in the 2005 paper.  The authors were asked to provide a written explanation of this case of apparent data duplication, which ASM found to be unsatisfactory.  Accordingly, ASM asked the authors to retract both the 2004 and 2005 JB articles with a full explanation.

ASM said they were unaware of an institutional investigation into the work, and corresponding author Juan Martín, of Universidad de León, has not responded to our request for comment. We’ve contacted Fouet to find out whether the Microbiology papers will be affected, and will update with anything we learn.

Hat tip: Craig Phelps